Durbin: FDA’s Weak Limits on E-Cigarettes Endanger Children

The proposed regulations would ban the sale of the products to minors, but they do not crack down on candy-flavored versions.

MIAMI, FL - FEBRUARY 20: Julia Boyle enjoys an electronic cigarette at the Vapor Shark store on February 20, 2014 in Miami, Florida. As the popularity of E- cigarettes continue to grow, leading U.S. tobacco companies such as Altria Group Inc. the maker of Marlboro cigarettes are annoucing plans to launch their own e-cigarettes as they start to pose a small but growing competitive threat to traditional smokes. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
National Journal
Clara Ritger
April 24, 2014, 7:27 a.m.

For the first time, the Food and Drug Ad­min­is­tra­tion has ex­ten­ded its to­bacco-over­sight au­thor­ity to e-ci­gar­ettes, ci­gars, and pipe to­bacco, but an­t­i­s­moking ad­voc­ates say the reg­u­la­tions don’t go far enough.

The FDA pro­posed Thursday a ban on the sale of e-ci­gar­ettes and oth­er newly reg­u­lated products to per­sons un­der 18. It also re­quired the products to carry warn­ing la­bels about the ad­dict­ive nature of nicot­ine. E-ci­gar­ettes, ci­gars, and pipe to­bacco would be treated like tra­di­tion­al com­bust­ible ci­gar­ettes un­der the new rules. E-ci­gar­ettes va­por­ize nicot­ine, dif­fer­ent from tra­di­tion­al com­bust­ible ci­gar­ettes which burn to­bacco, a pro­cess known to re­lease car­ci­no­gens.

Sen. Dick Durbin, an Illinois Demo­crat who has been among those in Con­gress push­ing the FDA to reg­u­late the e-ci­gar­ette mar­ket, called the FDA’s an­nounce­ment “a polit­ic­al com­prom­ise” with the to­bacco in­dustry.

“Pro­hib­it­ing sales to kids but do­ing noth­ing to pro­tect chil­dren from candy-flavored mar­ket­ing in chil­dren’s ven­ues is an aw­ful out­come,” Durbin said in an email. “Par­ents across Amer­ica lost their best ally in pro­tect­ing their kids from this in­si­di­ous product.”

Al­though the agency has had the power to set guidelines for the e-ci­gar­ette mar­ket since 2009, when Con­gress passed the To­bacco Con­trol Act, years of meet­ings with in­dustry lob­by­ists and an­t­i­s­moking ad­voc­ates led to Thursday’s reg­u­la­tions, seen by many as a “first step” in de­term­in­ing just how the FDA should as­sert its power over the grow­ing e-ci­gar­ette in­dustry.

“There’s so much po­ten­tial for e-ci­gar­ettes to be safer,” said Dav­id Ab­rams, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Schroeder In­sti­tute for To­bacco Re­search and Policy Stud­ies at the Leg­acy Found­a­tion, an an­t­i­s­moking non­profit de­voted to to­bacco con­trol. “If people switch to good-qual­ity, reg­u­lated e-ci­gar­ettes, we could see a drop in the death and dis­ease rates caused by tra­di­tion­al com­bust­ible ci­gar­ettes.”

The new reg­u­la­tions set the stage for the FDA to be­gin test­ing products on the mar­ket to de­term­ine their im­pact on pub­lic health. They also al­low the FDA to mon­it­or for qual­ity con­trol the mar­ket that was once de­scribed by Com­mis­sion­er Mar­garet Ham­burg as the “Wild, Wild West.”

Makers would have to re­gister their products with the FDA and dis­close in­gredi­ents. New to­bacco products could only be mar­keted after FDA ap­prov­al. Claims of products hav­ing a re­duced risk of death and dis­ease could only be mar­keted with sci­entif­ic evid­ence.

“To­bacco-re­lated dis­ease and death is one of the most crit­ic­al pub­lic-health chal­lenges be­fore the FDA,” said Mitch Zeller, dir­ect­or of the FDA’s Cen­ter for To­bacco Products, in a press re­lease. “The pro­posed rule would give the FDA ad­di­tion­al tools to pro­tect the pub­lic health in today’s rap­idly evolving to­bacco mar­ket­place, in­clud­ing the re­view of new to­bacco products and their health-re­lated claims.”

The pro­posed rule sets in mo­tion a 75-day com­ment peri­od. Fi­nal reg­u­la­tions could take up to a year, an­t­i­s­moking ad­voc­ates say.

One in­dustry lobby group, the To­bacco Va­por Elec­tron­ic Ci­gar­ette As­so­ci­ation, said the FDA’s move will add ne­ces­sary over­sight to the e-ci­gar­ette mar­ket.

“This will help the in­dustry thrive as it will de­mand that those ir­re­spons­ible play­ers ad­here to rules and reg­u­la­tions that the re­spons­ible in­dustry already abides by,” the group wrote in a let­ter pos­ted on­line. “This will not just be­ne­fit the e-cig in­dustry but ul­ti­mately the end user, as they will now get a re­li­able and con­sist­ent product that has been man­u­fac­tured with the highest de­gree of over­sight and con­trol.”

But an­t­i­s­moking ad­voc­ates, while pleased that the FDA had as­ser­ted its au­thor­ity after a long wait, said what was miss­ing from the pro­pos­al was wor­ri­some.

The FDA did not pro­pose re­stric­tions on ra­dio and tele­vi­sion ad­vert­ising, or lim­it­a­tions on candy-flavored products, which rep­res­ent­at­ives from the Amer­ic­an Can­cer So­ci­ety’s Can­cer Ac­tion Net­work said were used by to­bacco com­pan­ies to hook youth.

“We think it’s crit­ic­al that the FDA move as quickly as pos­sible to ad­dress the ad­vert­ising strategies and the design of the products that are clearly de­signed to be at­tract­ive to kids,” said Gregg Haif­ley, AC­SCAN’s as­so­ci­ate dir­ect­or of fed­er­al re­la­tions.

The FDA also pro­posed ex­empt­ing premi­um ci­gars from over­sight.

“There are health con­sequences as­so­ci­ated with to­bacco products, and we don’t think any should be ex­empt from reg­u­la­tion by the FDA,” Haif­ley said.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×