Wisconsin Weighs Delay in Removing Poor From BadgerCare

None

Walker: Where's the beef?
National Journal
Clara Ritger
See more stories about...
Clara Ritger
Dec. 4, 2013, 5:02 a.m.

The Wis­con­sin Le­gis­lature is sched­uled to vote Wed­nes­day on a meas­ure that would keep 72,000 res­id­ents from be­ing taken off the state’s health-cov­er­age plan for its low-in­come res­id­ents, but state Demo­crats say the delay would also post­pone cov­er­age for even more of the state’s poor.

Start­ing Jan. 1, Wis­con­sin­ites earn­ing more than 100 per­cent of the fed­er­al poverty line would be shif­ted off Badger­Care and in­to the Obama­care ex­change to pur­chase in­sur­ance. Be­cause of the tu­mul­tu­ous rol­lout of Health­Care.gov, Re­pub­lic­an Gov. Scott Walk­er for­mu­lated a plan to delay the trans­ition from Badger­Care un­til April 1.

Badger­Care of­fers in­sur­ance to Wis­con­sin­ites whose em­ploy­ers do not provide it and whose in­come is too high to qual­i­fy for Medi­caid. The pro­gram cov­ers people earn­ing up to 200 per­cent of the fed­er­al poverty line, but it will be rolled back to 100 per­cent of the fed­er­al poverty line, the least amount Amer­ic­ans can earn to qual­i­fy for premi­um tax cred­its on the ex­change.

The tim­ing of the roll­back is what’s now un­der con­sid­er­a­tion.

A delay would save tax­pay­ers $23 mil­lion, the state’s non­par­tis­an budget of­fice es­tim­ates. And with Oc­to­ber en­roll­ment mark­ing a mea­ger 877 Wis­con­sin­ites, the gov­ernor’s as­ser­tion that res­id­ents need more time to nav­ig­ate Health­Care.gov could pre­vent a cov­er­age gap for thou­sands of low-in­come shop­pers.

Demo­crats aren’t on board with the delay, however, be­cause it would also delay adding an es­tim­ated 83,000 res­id­ents liv­ing be­low the fed­er­al poverty line who would be­come newly eli­gible for the pro­gram.

“You in­tend to pay for the cost of ex­tend­ing Medi­caid/Badger­Care to these low-in­come Wis­con­sin cit­izens by delay­ing cov­er­age to even poorer Wis­con­sin cit­izens by the same three months,” wrote Demo­crat­ic state Sen. Tim Cul­len in a let­ter to Walk­er. “Put simply, you pro­pose to pay to cov­er the second-low­est in­come group by delay­ing cov­er­age to the very poorest Wis­con­sin cit­izens who have no cov­er­age today.”

Walk­er re­jec­ted fed­er­al money for Medi­caid ex­pan­sion, one of 25 Re­pub­lic­an U.S. gov­ernors to do so. He has said he does not be­lieve the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment will fol­low through on its prom­ise to cov­er the costs of ex­pan­sion.

He de­fends the delay of the Badger­Care over­haul with a sim­il­ar lo­gic.

“People who are tak­ing the Medi­caid ex­pan­sion are de­pend­ing on the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment liv­ing up to their com­mit­ment, a fed­er­al gov­ern­ment that can’t even get a web­site up and go­ing,” Walk­er said last month.

Since Walk­er’s com­ments and the un­veil­ing of his pro­pos­al, the Health and Hu­man Ser­vices De­part­ment has made hun­dreds of fixes to Health­Care.gov. On Sunday, it an­nounced that it met its goal to make the on­line fed­er­al ex­change a smooth ex­per­i­ence for “the vast ma­jor­ity of users.”

An­ec­dotes re­por­ted in the me­dia sug­gest that some Amer­ic­ans are still hit­ting obstacles when nav­ig­at­ing Health­Care.gov. But num­bers re­leased by HHS say the site has been up and run­ning more con­sist­ently, with low er­ror rates and short wait times, es­pe­cially when com­pared with the Oct. 1 launch.

Con­sumers have un­til Dec. 23 to sign up for ex­change cov­er­age that be­gins Jan. 1. If the Re­pub­lic­an-con­trolled Le­gis­lature ap­proves the delay, however, cur­rent Badger­Care re­cip­i­ents would be covered by the pro­gram through March, giv­ing them more time to shop for in­sur­ance, but for­cing oth­er low-in­come Wis­con­sin­ites to wait longer for cov­er­age.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
20 hours ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×