Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

U.S. Nuclear Lab Wraps Up Security Update 'Under Budget,' Despite Surprise Costs U.S. Nuclear Lab Wraps Up Security Update 'Under Budget,' Despite Surp...

NEXT :
This ad will end in seconds
 
Close X

Not a member or subscriber? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation
 

 

U.S. Nuclear Lab Wraps Up Security Update 'Under Budget,' Despite Surprise Costs

+

A U.S. flag seen in 2000 at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. The National Nuclear Security Administration said a security upgrade at the site was completed under budget, despite millions of dollars in unplanned costs.(Paul Buck/AFP/Getty Images)

Nuclear-arms officials said a Los Alamos National Laboratory security update was done under budget, despite millions of dollars in unplanned costs.

The U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration on Thursday said it spent $1 million less to improve protections at a sensitive area of the New Mexico site than its "original budget" had allocated.

 

However, the picture is a bit more complicated than that; program costs went down in April 2011, only to skyrocket anew later on as security boosts were installed at aging Los Alamos lab facilities that handle plutonium usable in nuclear arms.

Fixing the issues ultimately required tens of millions of dollars in unplanned expenses and more than a year of additional work, the Associated Press reported.

A nuclear agency official acknowledged in a Thursday statement that the effort to upgrade defenses at Technical Area 55 -- the country's sole site for manufacturing plutonium nuclear-bomb triggers -- was a "troubled project."

 

The comment by NNSA Associate Administrator Bob Raines was an allusion to flaws discovered in the late stages of the new system's delivery. His agency -- a semiautonomous branch of the Energy Department -- revealed the problems in late 2012, several months before the project was originally slated for completion.

The nuclear agency could still say that the project wrapped up "under budget," though, because its earliest cost estimate was far greater than a projection it adopted later on.

"Due to favorable contract bids in April 2011, NNSA reduced the estimated total project cost from $245 million to $213 million," Energy Department Inspector General Gregory Friedman said in a report earlier this year.

The cost of fixing the system's problems apparently eliminated most of the earlier-anticipated savings. Still, the project came in just short of the initial $245 million estimate, according to an NNSA news release.

 

Don't Miss Today's Top Stories

Keeps me informed about national leadership concerns."

Senior Military Officer

I can browse over breakfast or while on the metro."

AJ, US Army Officer

Sign up form for the newsletter
Comments
comments powered by Disqus
 
MORE NATIONAL JOURNAL