Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Reveal Navigation

Report on Terrorism Threats to Civilian Reactors Criticized Report on Terrorism Threats to Civilian Reactors Criticized Report on Terrorism Threats to Civilian Reactors Criticized Report on Terrorism Threa...

share
This ad will end in seconds
 
Close X

Not a member? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation
 

 

Global Security Newswire

Report on Terrorism Threats to Civilian Reactors Criticized

August 19, 2013

A University of Texas report last week overstated the threat potential aerial attacks pose on civilian atomic reactors, one nuclear scientist asserted in an opinion piece for Forbes on Saturday.

The report's authors concluded that Nuclear Regulatory Commission requirements for security measures at privately-run nuclear reactors are not as stringent as those governing Energy and Defense Department facilities. The report suggests that the if the commission does not enhance it requirements, the U.S. government should help fill the perceived gaps.

"There was no expert peer review, and the report only represents speculations," James Conca, who formerly headed an office at New Mexico State University that monitored the Energy Department's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, asserted in the Forbes piece. "The [report] authors confuse nuclear weapons with nuclear energy, and have no-first-hand knowledge of the security aspects of these facilities, since they have no access to such highly classified information."

This article was published in Global Security Newswire, which is produced independently by National Journal Group under contract with the Nuclear Threat Initiative. NTI is a nonprofit, nonpartisan group working to reduce global threats from nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons.

Get us in your feed.
 
Comments
comments powered by Disqus