Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Pentagon Weighs Iran, N. Korea War Readiness Under Existing Plans Pentagon Weighs Iran, N. Korea War Readiness Under Existing Plans

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Want access to this content? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation


Pentagon Weighs Iran, N. Korea War Readiness Under Existing Plans

The U.S. Defense Department has launched a far-reaching study to determine if the country's available military assets are still up to the task of carrying out battle plans formulated for possible use in hotspots such as Iran and the Korean Peninsula, high-level U.S. government personnel told the New York Times on Thursday.

U.S. military operations of recent years generally have had a more narrow focus than what might be required in a larger-scale regional flare-up, the newspaper suggested.


“The world didn’t wait for us while [we] were in Iraq and Afghanistan,” Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton Carter said. “This is something we are looking at very hard. What are the contingencies? What are the wars? And what is our operational approach to each one?”

The report came a day after Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel briefed journalists on what U.S. force cutbacks could be required if congressionally mandated budget cuts are sustained into the future.

Hagel did not publicly address at depth "how much could be saved by more senior-level attention to the projected costs for programs," such as the development of a next-generation strategic bomber, American University international relations professor Gordon Adams wrote in a  Foreign Policy magazine analysis.


This article was published in Global Security Newswire, which is produced independently by National Journal Group under contract with the Nuclear Threat Initiative. NTI is a nonprofit, nonpartisan group working to reduce global threats from nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons.

comments powered by Disqus