Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Pentagon Aims to Boost Accuracy of Ballistic Missile Defenses Pentagon Aims to Boost Accuracy of Ballistic Missile Defenses

NEXT :
This ad will end in seconds
 
Close X

Not a member or subscriber? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation
 

 

Pentagon Aims to Boost Accuracy of Ballistic Missile Defenses

+

Technicians prepare a Ground Based Interceptor for emplacement into Missile Field 2 at the Missile Defense Complex at Fort Greely, Alaska, in February 2012. Missile Defense Agency officials want to focus on increasingly the interceptor's accuracy, among other new initiatives.(Missile Defense Agency photo)

The Pentagon’s fiscal 2015 budget request funds new projects aimed at making U.S. ballistic missile defenses more accurate and reliable, a senior official said.

One of three such initiatives is redesigning the pivotal Ground Based Interceptor’s Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle, to the tune of $100 million in the upcoming fiscal year and $738 million through fiscal 2019. The project is part of the Missile Defense Agency’s $7.46 billion budget request, unveiled on Tuesday.

 

Plans to redesign the problem-plagued kill vehicle follow a “longstanding need” for greater reliability of the system, as evidenced by several intercept test failures over the past few years, Missile Defense Agency Director Vice Adm. James Syring told reporters.

The other related initiatives are development of a long-range discriminating radar for watching over the Pacific -- possibly from a location in Alaska -- and “discrimination improvements” for boosting existing homeland defenses, Syring said.

Mounted atop the Ground Based Interceptor, the kill vehicle is designed to slam into incoming missiles while in space and keep them from hitting U.S. targets.

 

The term "discrimination" in missile defense generally refers to an interceptor’s ability to identify and engage individual targets. Sophisticated ballistic missile attacks can include false warheads or other obscurants meant to confuse defensive systems. To succeed in knocking out incoming attacks, interceptors also need an ability to identify and pursue targets through any debris created by previous shots.

The new radar is budgeted at $80 million in fiscal 2015, which begins Oct. 1, and at $940 million through the end of the five-year program plan, according to an agency spokesman. Officials want $122 million for discrimination improvements in the next fiscal year and a total of $198 million through 2018.

The new investments would yield a ballistic missile defense architecture “capable of discriminating and killing a re-entry vehicle with a high degree of confidence,” Syring said. The language notably sets the bar higher for successful performance than in recent years, when officials instead stressed that the multibillion-dollar system should be expected to offer only limited capability. They attributed shortcomings to a decision more than 10 years ago to field a missile defense program in haste.

Michael Gilmore, the Pentagon’s chief weapons tester, wrote in an annual overview of weapon programs in January that the failed tests "raise questions regarding the robustness of the EKV's design” and recommended a retooling.

 

Exactly how the acquisition of a new kill vehicle would unfold, and whether current contractor Raytheon would get the business, is still an open question, Reuters reported on Tuesday.

Meanwhile, U.S. officials are sticking by plans to field 14 additional Ground-Based Interceptors at Fort Greely, Alaska, bringing the total number of deployed systems to 44 by 2017. The additional deployments, expected to cost $1 billion, are “unaffected” by the planned kill-vehicle redesign, according to Syring.

This article was published in Global Security Newswire, which is produced independently by National Journal Group under contract with the Nuclear Threat Initiative. NTI is a nonprofit, nonpartisan group working to reduce global threats from nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons.

Don't Miss Today's Top Stories

Keeps me informed about national leadership concerns."

Senior Military Officer

The best!"

Mark, Compensation Analyst

Timely and informative."

Dave, HR specialist

I can browse over breakfast or while on the metro."

AJ, US Army Officer

Sign up form for the newsletter
Comments
comments powered by Disqus
 
MORE NATIONAL JOURNAL