Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Analyst Doubts Threat Posed by Radioactive Kits Seen in North Korea Analyst Doubts Threat Posed by Radioactive Kits Seen in North Korea

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Want access to this content? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation


Analyst Doubts Threat Posed by Radioactive Kits Seen in North Korea

Issue specialists are doubtful that North Korea has created an arsenal of so-called "backpack nukes," despite an impression left at last week's high-profile military parade through Pyongyang, the Washington Times reported on Thursday.

During the Saturday military pageant, a number of North Korean soldiers were paraded before onlookers while clutching packs emblazoned with radioactive threat symbols.


One Western envoy, though, thinks the satchels were merely a pretense drummed up to scare North Korea's enemies.

"We don't take that seriously because they probably painted the radiation symbol over some Hello Kitty backpacks they stole form Japan," the anonymous official said. "No one believes that North Korea has the technology to make a miniature nuclear bomb like that."

"There are some good reasons to be concerned about North Korea's military capabilities, but right now backpack-size nukes aren't among them," said an unidentified U.S. official.


Another theory about the packs is that the North might have created simple radiological dispersal devices, also known as "dirty bombs,"  that would use conventional explosives to send radioactive materials across a large area.

This article was published in Global Security Newswire, which is produced independently by National Journal Group under contract with the Nuclear Threat Initiative. NTI is a nonprofit, nonpartisan group working to reduce global threats from nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons.

comments powered by Disqus