Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Insurance Regulatory Modernization: A Discussion Home and Abroad Insurance Regulatory Modernization: A Discussion Home and Abroad

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Want access to this content? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation



Insurance Regulatory Modernization: A Discussion Home and Abroad

Tuesday, April 29, 2014 8:00 AM - 10:30 AM EDT

The Hamilton | 600 14th Street, NW | Washington, DC 20005

(Kristoffer Tripplaar)

Today, insurance is the only major financial industry that is not formally regulated at the federal level—a tradition dating back to the 19th century. As the nation's insurance industry has become increasingly global in nature, many have begun to question whether the federal government should play a greater regulatory role in this market. The 2008 financial crisis, and the disputed role that U.S. insurers played in precipitating one of the world's worst economic downturns, has re-ignited this debate once more in Washington.

Lately, there has been a consensus that insurance industry regulation needs to be modernized in some fashion. Exactly who should regulate the insurance industry, however, has become a point of contention on Capitol Hill. In the aftermath of 2008, leaders of the major industrial nations agreed to hold the world's largest financial institutions accountable by strengthening the global financial regulatory framework. As a result, supporters of a federal regulatory system say that the United States needs a singular regulatory framework as contrasted with the existing multi-state system and would benefit from a single U.S. insurance voice at the international standard setting level. On the other hand, opponents of greater federal industry participation assert that it will increase prices and stymie domestic policy innovation. Instead, they say that improved regulation at the state level will allow insurers and local regulators to best manage the needs of their provincial customers while competing on a global scale.

What role should the federal government play in regulating the country's insurance industry? Should insurance be left to the states to oversee, or is a streamlined federal regulatory body necessary for proper industry oversight in today's globalized economy? And what are the international implications of this debate? These were some of the questions discussed at National Journal's April 29th policy summier that convened the nation's key opinion leaders for a robust discussion on insurance regulatory modernization, both home and abroad, in the 21st century.

Speaking at This Event
Related Content

How to Regulate Insurers in a Global Economy

Rep. Ed Royce said America's fragmented insurance regulatory system will leave the United States behind as the global market presses ahead.


National Journal LIVE is the premier events business inside the Beltway, with an unparalleled ability to convene top leaders for dialogue on how to solve the country’s biggest problems. Recent speakers have included Washington’s most senior leaders, such as Paul Ryan, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, John Kerry, Kathleen Sebelius, and dozens of members of Congress. National Journal Live flawlessly executes 75 events every single year, from intimate thought-leader dinners to full-day conferences. We host a total audience of 8,000 prominent Washington opinion leaders every year, including members of Congress, House and Senate staff, C-suite executives, and administration officials. Contact us to underwrite an event or with any questions.

Search Events