Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Dems, Too, Have Raided Clean-Energy Programs Dems, Too, Have Raided Clean-Energy Programs

This ad will end in seconds
 
Close X

Not a member? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation
 

 

Energy / ENERGY

Dems, Too, Have Raided Clean-Energy Programs

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., twice pushed legislation through the Senate to divert money from a clean-energy program for other initiatives.(Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

photo of Amy Harder
September 26, 2011

Senate Democrats oppose a House Republican plan to take money from clean-energy loan guarantee programs to pay for disaster relief as part of a short-term spending bill. But on two occasions, Democrats themselves initiated and pushed through Congress plans to divert large amounts of money from the renewable-energy loan guarantee program now at the center of the Solyndra saga.

In the summer of 2009, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D.-Nev., pushed through the chamber a measure that dipped into the Energy Department program, taking $2 billion to pay for extending the administration’s successful “cash for clunkers” program. The following summer, Reid again persuaded Senate Democrats to agree to take another $1.5 billion from the program to finance state aid for teachers. 

The Democratic initiatives combined cut the renewable-energy loan guarantee program by more than half, slicing the $6 billion initiative to $2.5 billion.

 

Democrats weren’t thrilled with Reid either time he dipped into the clean-energy program’s coffers, but lawmakers kept their frustrations in check. Now Democrats are standing firm against GOP efforts to pay for disaster relief by using $1.5 billion from a similar DOE program that provides loan guarantees to clean, advanced vehicle technologies and a relatively small slice—$100 million—from the program that gave Solyndra its loan guarantee.

On Monday, Boehner spokesman Michael Steel chided Democrats. “Washington Democrats didn’t mind diverting energy money to ‘cash for clunkers,’ but they won’t use the money for disaster relief.”

Reid’s office says that Democrats object to using any existing program to pay for federal disaster aid, which has not historically been subject to any kind of congressional quid pro quo. “The point is, we shouldn’t have to set the precedent that we need to cut jobs in order to pay for disaster aid,” Reid spokesman Adam Jentleson said. “When disaster strikes we should be able to get the relief to them as soon as possible without entering into a political debate.”

The stalemate surrounds House Republicans’ attempt to take $1.5 billion from the Energy Department’s clean-auto loan guarantee program and use it to fund the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which will run out of money this week if Congress doesn’t provide more money. The entire government will shut down if Congress doesn’t pass a short-term continuing resolution by midnight Friday. 

The Energy Department's loan guarantee program for advanced vehicle technologies was appropriated $7.5 billion in September 2008 and has about $4 billion remaining. 

Democrats and powerful interest groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, are fighting for the program. The chamber wrote Congress last week urging Washington not to cut funding. And House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, failed to get the necessary votes to pass a spending bill last Wednesday in part because of some opposition within his own party to cuts in the auto loan program.

Boehner then moved to trim $100 million from the Energy Department's renewable-energy program—the one that issued a loan guarantee to Solyndra, the failed California start-up that is now the subject of an FBI probe. The program, which was created under President Obama's stimulus in 2009, ends on Friday anyway.

The political landscape has shifted since Reid took money from the renewable-energy program in 2009 and 2010, namely because of the growing clout of tea party-backed conservatives in Congress who want to see the government stop funding clean energy altogether.

“Both choices [to divert Energy Department programs to fund FEMA] are emblematic of key ideological differences between the two parties playing to their ‘bases’ ahead of the 2012 elections,” notes an analysis by consulting firm ClearView Energy Partners, released on Monday. “These are the sorts of programs that unions and environmentalists will call on Democrats to protect and tea party conservatives will call on Republicans to eliminate.”

LIKE THIS STORY? Sign up for Energy Edge

Sign up for our daily newsletter and stay on top of energy coverage.

Sign up form for Energy Edge
Job Board
Search Jobs
Transportation Planner
American Society of Civil Engineers | Salinas, CA
Biomedical Service Internship Position
American Society of Civil Engineers | Flint, MI
Fire Sprinkler Inspector
American Society of Civil Engineers | Charlotte, NC
Deputy Director of Transit Operations
American Society of Civil Engineers | San Jose, CA
Structural Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | New Haven, CT
Assessment and Remediation Team Lead
American Society of Civil Engineers | Regina, SK
Professional Development Program Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Farmington Hills, MI
Assistant Professor - Water Resources/Ecological Engineering
American Society of Civil Engineers | Auburn, AL
Quality Systems Manager
American Society of Civil Engineers | Greensboro, NC
Rail Field Construction Inspector
American Society of Civil Engineers | Jacksonville, FL
Manager, Quality Assurance
American Society of Civil Engineers | Memphis, TN
Sr. Controls Systems Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Grand Island, NE
Quality Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Attica, IN
Civil Engineering
American Society of Civil Engineers | Steamboat Springs, CO
Commissioning Intern
American Society of Civil Engineers | Chicago, IL
 
Comments
comments powered by Disqus