Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Can Obama's Energy Trust Fund Idea Gain Traction in Congress? Can Obama's Energy Trust Fund Idea Gain Traction in Congress?

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Want access to this content? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation


Can Obama's Energy Trust Fund Idea Gain Traction in Congress?


President Obama got behind the wheel of an electric Chevy Volt during his tour of the General Motors plant in Hamtramck, Mich., in July 2010. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

Gasoline prices and global temperatures are on the rise and so, once again, is pressure on Washington to take action on energy and climate change. The chance that the deadlocked Congress will strike a deal this year on a broad law to seriously reform the nation’s energy systems is slim to nil.

But a few cracks are emerging in that deadlock, with genuine bipartisan support gathering around a cluster of ideas linking energy priorities from both parties, such as offshore drilling and offshore wind power. The ideas aren’t comprehensive – but even movement on a few small-bite energy bills would represent a big change from the politicized standoffs and sniping of recent years. 


Today, President Obama will highlight one of those ideas, and call on Congress to take action on it. For once, that might even happen. 

The venue and timing are appropriate: gasoline prices have soared 41 cents per gallon since the beginning of the year, and Obama will speak at the Energy Department’s Argonne National Laboratory, which researches electric cars and other alternative vehicle technology.

Against the backdrop of electric cars at a time when Americans are feeling the pain of higher gasoline costs, Obama will ask Congress to take action on an idea he first proposed last month in his State of the Union address: the creation of an energy trust fund that would research alternative-technology vehicles. The fund would get $2 billion over 10 years, not from taxpayer dollars, but from revenues generated by offshore oil and gas drilling. The idea is to channel money generated by drilling into a fund that researches technology that would ultimately lessen the nation’s dependence on oil – and its global-warming emissions. It won’t be enough to end both problems, but it would be a small step in that direction.


In his State of the Union address, Obama said, “Indeed, much of our newfound energy is drawn from lands and waters that we, the public, own together. So tonight, I propose we use some of our oil and gas revenues to fund an Energy Security Trust that will drive new research and technology to shift our cars and trucks off oil for good. If a nonpartisan coalition of CEOs and retired generals and admirals can get behind this idea, then so can we. Let’s take their advice and free our families and businesses from the painful spikes in gas prices we’ve put up with for far too long.”

The idea is the brainchild of the small Washington think tank Securing America’s Energy Future, which published a report in December recommending the creation of the trust fund – although the SAFE proposal recommends funding the research through revenues generated by new, rather than existing offshore drilling. SAFE’s board of directors is headed by Fred Smith, the former Republican senator and former CEO of FedEx Corp., and retired Marine Corps General P.X. Kelley – the pair mentioned in Obama’s speech.

On Dec. 3, the same day SAFE published the report, the group’s CEO, Robbie Diamond, met with both White House senior energy adviser Heather Zichal, and with the staff of Alaska's Sen. Lisa Murkowski, the top Republican on the Senate Energy Committee. Both the Democratic White House and the GOP senator liked the idea –- and have since met to talk about moving it through Congress.

comments powered by Disqus