Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Battle Over Coal Continues to Rage at House Hearing Battle Over Coal Continues to Rage at House Hearing

This ad will end in seconds
 
Close X

Not a member? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation
 

 

Energy

Battle Over Coal Continues to Rage at House Hearing

House Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee member Phil Gingrey, R-Ga., says the Obama administration is waging a war on coal.(Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

photo of Clare Foran
October 29, 2013

The battle over coal continued to rage Tuesday afternoon during a hearing held by the House Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee on the community impacts of impending Environmental Protection Agency regulations for power plants.

Subcommittee Chairman Tim Murphy, R-Pa., made clear that the purpose of the hearing was not to discuss the ins and outs of the regulations or talk about how they were created. The purpose, he said, was to allow members of Congress to hear from people most affected by the EPA rule-making.

"These workers bear the immediate cost of EPA's actions," Murphy said in his opening remarks. "Too often, the practice in Washington is to listen as Beltway experts and the EPA explain agency actions. But this practice doesn't capture the daily impact of Washington on the distant communities where good jobs, with good wages, support a proud way of life."

 

Participating in the hearing were a number of representatives of these 'distant communities', including city and county administrators from coal-rich regions and union representatives for the coal and mining industry.

Without exception, those testifying on behalf of coal communities slammed the regulations, saying they would have a devastating impact on the industry.

Some appealed directly to members of the panel, asking them to block the rule-making.

"I am asking you to please help stem the tide of unemployment and poverty by curtailing the EPA regulations that so drastically impact the production of Appalachian coal," said Albey Brock, a county judge and executive from Pineville, Ky.

Others expressed a sense of disillusionment with the current administration.

"This is my president. I voted for Obama," said Raymond Ventrone, business manager for the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers Local Lodge 154 in Pittsburgh. "I went forward and asked other people to vote for this president, but all I want is for [the regulations] to be put in the hands of Congress. I think it's the job of Congress to put a bill [forward] and let them debate what should go on here. I don't think the EPA should be setting the standard for what's going on right now."

The lone panel participant, apart from the lawmakers, not from a coal background was Dan Weiss, senior fellow and director of climate strategy for the progressive Center for American Progress Action Fund; he was a last-minute addition to the hearing lineup.

Weiss offered a counterpoint to the concerns expressed by Ventrone, Brock, and others, arguing that EPA regulations were unlikely to have dire impacts.

Subcommittee members waited for the witnesses to finish before chiming in. Rep. Mike Doyle, D-Pa., voiced support for the deployment of carbon capture and sequestration, otherwise known as clean-coal technology. "For coal to have a future we need to invest in the technologies that allow us to burn that coal cleanly," Doyle said. "What this Congress should be doing is a mission-to-the-moon project on research on how to deal with this issue."

Rep. Phil Gingrey, R-Ga., on the other hand, criticized the president for allowing the regulations to go forward. "I want to thank Chairman Murphy for holding this hearing to examine the impact that the Obama administration's continued—and make no mistake about it, war on coal is what it is—is having on local communities," Gingrey said.

The hearing followed a rally on the west lawn of the Capitol protesting EPA regulations targeting coal-fired power plants and came one day after the release of a discussion draft of legislation introduced by Rep. Ed Whitfield, R-Ky. and Sen Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., to block proposed regulations that would limit carbon emissions from future power plants.

LIKE THIS STORY? Sign up for Energy Edge

Sign up for our daily newsletter and stay on top of energy coverage.

Sign up form for Energy Edge
Job Board
Search Jobs
Professional Development Program Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Farmington Hills, MI
Biomedical Service Internship Position
American Society of Civil Engineers | Flint, MI
Deputy Director of Transit Operations
American Society of Civil Engineers | San Jose, CA
Structural Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | New Haven, CT
Transportation Planner
American Society of Civil Engineers | Salinas, CA
Assessment and Remediation Team Lead
American Society of Civil Engineers | Regina, SK
Quality Systems Manager
American Society of Civil Engineers | Greensboro, NC
Quality Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Attica, IN
Senior Water Resource Project Manager
American Society of Civil Engineers | Fairfax, VA
Civil Engineering
American Society of Civil Engineers | Steamboat Springs, CO
Entry Level Geotechnical Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Albany, NY
Sales Engineer-Process Automation/Instrumentation
American Society of Civil Engineers
Senior Project Manager- Transportation
American Society of Civil Engineers | San Antonio, TX
Materials Engineer 2
American Society of Civil Engineers | IL
Land Surveyor
American Society of Civil Engineers
 
Comments
comments powered by Disqus