Why Oil Companies Are Asking for More Regulation

None

The corporate logo of Shell, a Dutch petroleum company, is seen under a midafternoon sky in Kuala Lumpur on March 31, 2008. Malaysia's conservative Islamic party PAS on March 31 urged Muslims worldwide to launch a commercial boycott of Dutch products to protest against a film deemed insulting to Islam. 
National Journal
Ben Geman
May 5, 2014, 11:58 a.m.

Ex­xon and Shell want glob­al gov­ern­ment. Or the equi­val­ent. At least when it comes to reg­u­la­tions that will force the oil gi­ants to dis­close pay­ments to for­eign gov­ern­ments for do­ing busi­ness in their coun­tries.

In a new let­ter to the Se­cur­it­ies and Ex­change Com­mis­sion, Ex­xon and Shell urge the SEC to hurry up and is­sue the con­tro­ver­sial rules on in­dustry pay­ment dis­clos­ure.

Why? So that loom­ing European dis­clos­ure man­dates can be synced — the let­ter uses the term “equi­val­ency” — with the U.S. re­quire­ments. The United King­dom, the let­ter notes, is “mov­ing quickly” to be­come the first European Uni­on state to im­ple­ment E.U. trans­par­ency rules.

If the U.S. com­mits to act­ing this year, there’s enough time to in­flu­ence the U.K and hence the over­all E.U ap­proach, Ex­xon and Shell ar­gue in the let­ter, not­ing the be­ne­fits of a “co­ordin­ated and har­mon­ized glob­al trans­par­ency re­gime.”

Con­versely, “no one be­ne­fits” if mul­tina­tion­al com­pan­ies must file sep­ar­ate kinds of dis­clos­ure re­ports in sep­ar­ate places.

“An ideal solu­tion to the is­sue might be that com­pli­ance with the re­port­ing rules in one coun­try would be deemed to sat­is­fy the re­port­ing re­quire­ments in an­oth­er coun­try not­with­stand­ing vari­ations in de­tail,” adds the May 1 let­ter to SEC com­mis­sion­ers, which sur­faced on the SEC’s web­site a few days ago.

Ex­xon and Shell have in­terests at stake that go far bey­ond the eso­ter­ic de­tails of dis­clos­ure pa­per­work. They’re part of a ma­jor, years-long oil-in­dustry cam­paign to give the sec­tor lots of lee­way and keep spe­cif­ic com­pan­ies’ SEC dis­clos­ure fil­ings out of pub­lic view.

The in­dustry warns that an overly pre­script­ive rule that also makes de­tailed pay­ment in­form­a­tion pub­lic will hobble West­ern oil com­pan­ies com­pet­ing world­wide against state-con­trolled Rus­si­an and Chinese firms that aren’t bound by the man­dates.

Last sum­mer, a fed­er­al judge threw out an earli­er ver­sion of the SEC rule that oil and busi­ness groups had chal­lenged.

The oil in­dustry has long op­posed the dis­clos­ure man­date, and now at least hopes to en­sure that the SEC’s on­go­ing re­write pro­duces a less ag­gress­ive rule.

The U.S. rules will force SEC-lis­ted oil, nat­ur­al gas, and min­ing com­pan­ies to dis­close pay­ments to gov­ern­ments in na­tions where they have pro­jects, such as money for pro­duc­tion li­censes, taxes, roy­al­ties, and more.

The rule is aimed at chip­ping away at the “re­source curse” of cor­rup­tion, con­flict, and poverty in en­ergy-rich na­tions in Africa and else­where. Hu­man-rights groups say the oil in­dustry is seek­ing ex­emp­tions that would ef­fect­ively gut the reg­u­la­tion, which is re­quired un­der the 2010 Dodd-Frank fin­an­cial law.

Ex­xon and Shell — both world­wide op­er­at­ors — are ask­ing the SEC to pub­lish draft rules ASAP, or at least be­fore year’s end. A com­mit­ment to act this year could con­vince the U.K. to push back its im­ple­ment­a­tion to April 2015, thereby provid­ing “suf­fi­cient time” to col­lab­or­ate be­fore any E.U. states com­plete their rules, the let­ter states.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×