A Month After Spill, ‘West Virginians Need Answers Now,’ State Official Says

None

WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 04: Natalie Tennant (L), West Virginia Secretary of State, testifies during a Senate Water and Wildlife Subcommittee hearing on Capitol Hill on February 4, 2014 in Washington, DC. The subcommittee is hearing testimony on the safety and security of the drinking water in West Virginia following a chemical spill that contaminated a large part of the state's water system last month. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
National Journal
Clare Foran
Feb. 4, 2014, 2:18 p.m.

While mem­bers of Con­gress duel over le­gis­lat­ive safe­guards to pre­vent fu­ture spills, West Vir­gin­ia of­fi­cials say im­me­di­ate ac­tion is needed to deal with fal­lout from a chem­ic­al leak that led to a par­tial drink­ing-wa­ter ban in the state last month.

“West Vir­gini­ans need an­swers now,” Sec­ret­ary of State Nat­alie Ten­nant said Tues­day at a Sen­ate sub­com­mit­tee hear­ing. “People are fed up. They are angry, and they are scared.”

Back-and-forth among state and loc­al au­thor­it­ies over drink­ing-wa­ter con­tam­in­a­tion has caused pub­lic dis­trust and sparked con­cern that the wa­ter from the Elk River near Char­le­ston still poses a threat to pub­lic health.

In mid-Janu­ary, health of­fi­cials in the state cau­tioned preg­nant wo­men against drink­ing the wa­ter des­pite the fact that the ban on drink­ing wa­ter had already been lif­ted.

Adding fuel to the fire, re­ports sur­faced late last month that the chem­ic­al that had leaked in­to the river — a form of meth­an­ol known as MCHM — may be break­ing down in­to form­al­de­hyde, a known car­ci­no­gen.

“Lack of con­sist­ent, trust­worthy in­form­a­tion has been among our greatest chal­lenges and frus­tra­tions in the af­ter­math of the Elk River chem­ic­al spill,” Ten­nant told the Sen­ate En­vir­on­ment and Pub­lic Works Sub­com­mit­tee on Wa­ter and Wild­life.

The West Vir­gin­ia of­fi­cial voiced sup­port for le­gis­la­tion in­tro­duced last week by Demo­crat­ic Sens. Jay Rock­e­feller and Joe Manchin of West Vir­gin­ia and Bar­bara Box­er of Cali­for­nia man­dat­ing reg­u­lar in­spec­tions of chem­ic­al stor­age tanks, but she called on sen­at­ors to do more than of­fer an un­cer­tain le­gis­lat­ive fix.

Ten­nant asked sub­com­mit­tee mem­bers to join her and res­id­ents of the state in pe­ti­tion­ing the fed­er­al Cen­ters for Dis­ease Con­trol to ex­plain how it ar­rived at a re­cent de­term­in­a­tion that drink­ing wa­ter is safe for pub­lic con­sump­tion in the state.

“Each one of those sig­na­tures is a mom, dad, friend, or neigh­bor,” Ten­nant said. “They de­serve to know with 100 per­cent cer­tainty that what’s com­ing out of their faucets will not harm them and their fam­il­ies.”

She also asked sen­at­ors to work with state and loc­al of­fi­cials and the De­part­ment of Health and Hu­man Ser­vices to de­vel­op a study of the long-term con­sequences of the spill.

Rock­e­feller echoed Ten­nant’s con­cerns. “West Vir­gini­ans want to know four things,” he said. “How did this hap­pen? Is the wa­ter now safe? What are the long-term health con­sequences … and how do we make sure this nev­er hap­pens again?”

Testi­mony provided dur­ing the hear­ing also poin­ted to the lurk­ing po­ten­tial for oth­er chem­ic­al spills in the state.

Ac­cord­ing to Randy Huff­man, head of the West Vir­gin­ia De­part­ment of En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion, a state in­vest­ig­a­tion found that more than 100 stor­age tanks sim­il­ar to the one that leaked in the most re­cent chem­ic­al spill are loc­ated near drink­ing wa­ter sup­plies.

“These num­bers clearly raise con­cerns that this in­cid­ent could be re­peated in oth­er areas of the state,” Huff­man said.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
2 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×