EPA Vows Action on Fracking Rules, Policy

None

<p>Voters in four Colorado towns went to the polls Tuesday to decide on anti-fracking measures, which could influence the conversation nationwide.</p>
National Journal
Ben Geman
Jan. 15, 2014, 6:01 a.m.

The En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency is seek­ing to as­sure en­vir­on­ment­al­ists that it hasn’t dropped the ball on over­sight of hy­draul­ic frac­tur­ing.

A let­ter from EPA Ad­min­is­trat­or Gina Mc­Carthy to the Nat­ur­al Re­sources De­fense Coun­cil vows the agency will take steps on sev­er­al fronts to boost the en­vir­on­ment­al safety of frack­ing, the oil-and-gas ex­trac­tion meth­od that’s en­abling U.S. en­ergy pro­duc­tion to soar.

“The EPA is mov­ing for­ward on sev­er­al ini­ti­at­ives to provide reg­u­lat­ory clar­ity with re­spect to ex­ist­ing laws and us­ing ex­ist­ing au­thor­it­ies where ap­pro­pri­ate to en­hance pub­lic health and en­vir­on­ment­al safe­guards,” Mc­Carthy writes in a Jan. 10 let­ter.

The news­let­ter En­ergy­Wire, which re­por­ted on the let­ter earli­er Wed­nes­day, notes that Mc­Carthy is re­spond­ing to a Septem­ber let­ter from NRDC’s pres­id­ent about EPA’s de­cision to drop wa­ter-con­tam­in­a­tion en­force­ment cases and probes in three states in re­cent years.

Mc­Carthy’s let­ter de­fends those de­cisions while tout­ing vari­ous pending ini­ti­at­ives.

They in­clude planned per­mit­ting “guid­ance” on frack­ing activ­it­ies that use dies­el fuels; the agency’s on­go­ing study of the ef­fects of frack­ing on drink­ing-wa­ter re­sources; and sup­port for planned In­teri­or De­part­ment reg­u­la­tions that will gov­ern frack­ing on pub­lic lands.

And Mc­Carthy says EPA hasn’t for­got­ten about plans, an­nounced in 2011, to craft reg­u­la­tions un­der the Tox­ic Sub­stances Con­trol Act to ob­tain more data from in­dustry on chem­ic­als used in frack­ing.

“The EPA will launch a stake­hold­er- and pub­lic-en­gage­ment pro­cess to seek in­put on the design and scope of such chem­ic­al re­port­ing,” Mc­Carthy writes.

Bey­ond that, she notes that EPA “an­ti­cip­ates mov­ing for­ward” with re­vi­sions to wastewa­ter reg­u­la­tions to provide more con­trols on dis­charges from oil-and-gas de­vel­op­ment that uses frack­ing.

The let­ter touts pri­or EPA ac­tions, in­clud­ing 2012 air-pol­lu­tion rules for hy­draul­ic­ally frac­tured wells. Check it out here.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
&#8216;PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER&#8217;
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×