Another Battle Looms in the Endless Ethanol War

None

WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 25: Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) (R), Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, and Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) speak about immigration during a news conference on Capitol Hill, April 25, 2013 in Washington, DC. The news conference was held to discuss immigration control issues that are before Congress. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
National Journal
Clare Foran
Dec. 4, 2013, 4:19 p.m.

The de­bate over the re­new­able-fuel stand­ard flared up again this week ahead of a hear­ing the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency will hold on Thursday to so­li­cit feed­back on a pro­pos­al to lower the 2014 pro­duc­tion man­date.

In­terest groups from both sides of the de­bate have found com­mon ground on one point — they want the pro­pos­al changed. But that’s where the con­sensus ends.

Bio­fuels back­ers say the EPA’s pro­posed cut­backs go too far. Ad­vanced Bio­fuels As­so­ci­ation Pres­id­ent Mi­chael McAdams called the 2014 levels an­nounced last month a “woe­fully in­ad­equate tar­get,” and re­ferred to the draft as the “in­dustry’s worst night­mare” dur­ing a call with re­port­ers on Wed­nes­day.

The oil and gas in­dustry and oth­er in­terest groups, in­clud­ing res­taur­ant and poultry as­so­ci­ations, say that while EPA’s de­cision to po­ten­tially lower next year’s re­new­able-fuel volume ob­lig­a­tions is a step in the right dir­ec­tion, the man­date needs to be dis­as­sembled. And they’re look­ing for a le­gis­lat­ive fix.

“We’ve al­ways main­tained that the ac­tions of the EPA will be short-term in nature, and we really are look­ing to mem­bers of Con­gress to ad­dress this severely flawed and out­dated re­new­able-fuel stand­ard,” Charles Dre­vna, pres­id­ent of the Amer­ic­an Fuel and Pet­ro­chem­ic­al Man­u­fac­tur­ers As­so­ci­ation, said Wed­nes­day dur­ing a press call.

Eth­an­ol back­ers dis­agree, say­ing that au­thor­ity to amend the man­date should re­main with EPA des­pite their cri­ti­cism of the agency’s most re­cent pro­pos­al.

“[This] is en­tirely an ad­min­is­trat­ive chal­lenge,” Brooke Cole­man, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Ad­vanced Eth­an­ol Coun­cil, told Na­tion­al Journ­al Daily. “While mem­bers of Con­gress can and should weigh in on the mat­ter, there is no need for any sort of le­gis­la­tion. We have is­sues with the pro­pos­al and will seek to get it fixed ad­min­is­trat­ively. But as we have said all along, EPA has the au­thor­ity it needs to ad­min­is­ter the law prop­erly without fur­ther ac­tion by Con­gress.”

Con­gress has so far been slow to take up the is­sue any­way, and there’s spec­u­la­tion that EPA’s move to lower the tar­gets might make law­makers less likely to act.

“I do think that EPA ac­tion took the pres­sure off, at least mo­ment­ar­ily,” said Rep. Peter Welch, D-Vt. “But the pres­sure for Con­gress to act isn’t go­ing away. If any­thing, EPA’s de­cision shows that there’s a grow­ing con­sensus that the man­date is not work­ing.”

What is clear, however, is that ac­tion won’t come this year — at least not in the House. A spokes­per­son for the House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee con­firmed that there are no hear­ings planned on the is­sue for the re­mainder of the year.

“I doubt there will be much of an ap­pet­ite for mov­ing le­gis­la­tion un­til the rule­mak­ing for 2014 shakes out,” said Rep. Jim Costa, D-Cal­if. “My hope is that my col­leagues will come back next year ready to dis­cuss and ap­prove real, whole­sale changes to the RFS.”

Costa and Welch, along with Reps. Bob Good­latte, R-Va., and Steve Womack, R-Ark., have in­tro­duced le­gis­la­tion to lim­it the total amount of eth­an­ol re­finers would need to blend with gas­ol­ine un­der the man­date. The bill re­mains pending in com­mit­tee.

In Novem­ber, aides for Sens. Di­anne Fein­stein, D-Cal­if., and Tom Coburn, R-Okla., told Na­tion­al Journ­al that the sen­at­ors were work­ing to­geth­er to draft le­gis­la­tion to elim­in­ate the corn-eth­an­ol man­date from the stand­ard. But the le­gis­la­tion has not yet sur­faced, and neither of­fice re­spon­ded to a re­quest for com­ment on the status of the meas­ure on Wed­nes­day.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×