Lawmakers Say EPA’s ‘Energy Star’ Program Lacks Transparency

None

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 21: Committee Chairman Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) listens as members speak during a markup meeting of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee March 21, 2013 in Washington, DC. The committee met to vote on the nomination of Sarah Jewell for the position of Secretary of the Interior.
National Journal
Clare Foran
See more stories about...
Clare Foran
Dec. 3, 2013, 4:51 p.m.

A bi­par­tis­an group of law­makers is rais­ing con­cerns that the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency has not been trans­par­ent in draft­ing en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency stand­ards un­der the En­ergy Star pro­gram.

In a let­ter sent to EPA Ad­min­is­trat­or Gina Mc­Carthy on Tues­day af­ter­noon, a group of eight sen­at­ors, in­clud­ing Sen­ate En­ergy and Nat­ur­al Re­sources Com­mit­tee Chair­man Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and rank­ing mem­ber Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, called on the agency to make the in­form­a­tion used to draft spe­cific­a­tions un­der the pro­gram pub­licly avail­able. The sen­at­ors also sug­ges­ted that the agency has not al­ways been will­ing to con­sider the view­points of in­di­vidu­als and or­gan­iz­a­tions that stand to be im­pacted by the cre­ation or re­vi­sion of En­ergy Star stand­ards.

“We ex­pect that stake­hold­ers will be giv­en the op­por­tun­ity to of­fer their in­put, that their views will be fairly con­sidered, that EPA’s de­cisions will be based on a fair and reas­on­able ana­lys­is of the re­cord, and that this re­cord will be made avail­able to stake­hold­ers and the pub­lic,” the let­ter states.

The let­ter comes on the heels of a sim­il­ar re­quest made late last month by a group of 23 House mem­bers seek­ing in­creased trans­par­ency in the pro­gram.

Last week, a bi­par­tis­an co­ali­tion of law­makers, in­clud­ing Reps. Peter Welch, D-Vt., and Cory Gard­ner, R-Colo., sent a sim­il­ar let­ter to Mc­Carthy, this one ques­tion­ing the En­ergy Star pro­gram’s re­cent draft spe­cific­a­tions for win­dows, doors, and sky­lights. EPA’s fi­nal draft ver­sion of the pro­pos­al may in­crease the costs to con­sumers for home-im­prove­ment ma­ter­i­als cer­ti­fied by En­ergy Star, the let­ter ar­gued.

“We be­lieve that a ‘reas­on­able’ pay­back peri­od on cus­tom­er in­vest­ment must be en­sured when the new stand­ards are fi­nal­ized, and we are con­cerned that EPA is not tak­ing this is­sue ser­i­ously enough,” the let­ter states.

The pay­back peri­od refers to the amount of time it will take con­sumers to re­coup the up­front cost of pur­chas­ing a product cer­ti­fied un­der the pro­gram through sav­ings real­ized from en­ergy ef­fi­ciency.

“The agency is ig­nor­ing the real world im­plic­a­tions of their new stand­ards,” the let­ter warns.

It also goes on to say that the pro­cess used to fi­nal­ize the most re­cent draft pro­pos­al for win­dows, doors, and sky­lights was not con­duc­ted in a trans­par­ent man­ner, echo­ing con­cerns raised by sen­at­ors who signed the let­ter sent Tues­day.

The Co­ali­tion for Home En­ergy Ef­fi­ciency, made up of in­di­vidu­als, man­u­fac­tur­ers, and re­tail­ers whose self-de­scribed aim is to “pre­serve and pro­tect” the En­ergy Star pro­gram, fa­cil­it­ated the col­lec­tion of sig­na­tures on both let­ters and is also col­lect­ing sig­na­tures on a pe­ti­tion that will be sent to the White House, both cham­bers of Con­gress, and EPA call­ing for an ad­just­ment to the spe­cific­a­tion for win­dows, doors, and sky­lights.

EPA re­leased a fi­nal draft for its latest spe­cific­a­tion for win­dows, doors, and sky­lights in Ju­ly. The spe­cific­a­tion is ex­pec­ted to be fi­nal­ized in mid-Decem­ber and will take ef­fect at the start of 2015. The agency did not im­me­di­ately re­spond to a re­quest for com­ment.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×