BUDGET

GOP's Cuts Would Cost 200,000 Jobs, Bernanke Says

Updated: March 2, 2011 | 6:40 p.m.
March 2, 2011 | 1:27 p.m.
John Moore/Getty Images/Dec. 2, 2010

Employers and job applicants meet at a career in Denver. The event was billed as the Women's Job Fair, although male applicants were also allowed to attend. Republican plans to cut $60 billion from the federal budget would cost roughly 200,000 American jobs, according to Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke.

Republican plans to cut $60 billion from the federal budget would cost roughly 200,000 American jobs, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke told the House Financial Services Committee today.

The remarks follow comments Bernanke made before the Senate Banking Committee on Tuesday in which he characterized estimates of higher job losses from two private forecasters as too severe.

Democrats and Republicans alike have cited the Fed chairman's statements on the effects of deficit reduction as negotiations continued on a longer-term budget. Democrats have pointed out Bernanke believes cuts are sure to have a contractionary effect that would take away from a still fragile labor market recovery. Republicans note that his estimates are more conservative than others from economists at Goldman Sachs and Moody's Analytics. Those called, respectively, for a reduction of 2 percentage points in GDP growth during the spring and summer quarters and for a loss of 700,000 jobs.

Bernanke was repeatedly asked about the other estimates at the hearings but defended the Fed's numbers, saying he wasn't sure why the private forecasters got such a high number.

"I frankly don't understand where -- 2 percent is an enormous effect," he said on Tuesday. "Two percent of the GDP is 300 billion right there. So assuming a multiplier of one, you know, 60 [billion dollars] to a hundred billion is not sufficient to get to that level."

Want to stay ahead of the curve? Sign up for National Journal’s AM & PM Must Reads. News and analysis to ensure you don’t miss a thing.

Join the Discussion
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
  • NationalJournal on Twitter
  • NationalJournal on Facebook
  • NationalJournal on Tumblr
  • NationalJournal's RSS Feeds
  • NationalJournal's Email Newsletters
  • NationalJournal on iPhone and iPad
Special Section
The Next Economy

Living Longer Is a Blessing, Not a Curse

Baby boomers are fast becoming elderly boomers, a demographic change that will shape the nation’s society—and its economy—for decades to come.

COLUMNS
Reid Wilson: On the Trail

The New Democratic Litmus Test

February 18, 2012
Obama likely will be the last Democrat to win party's presidential nomination without backing same-sex marriage.
Gwen Ifill: Gwen's Take

Black History or American History: What’s the Difference?

February 16, 2012

I’ve often wondered what it meant that the month we set aside to take special note of African-American achievement is the one that’s usually only 28 days long.

Charlie Cook: Charlie Cook's The Cook Report

Risky Business

February 16, 2012
Don’t be fooled into thinking that today’s events will turn November’s election. A lot of time remains.
More Columns »
Get a trial subscription to National Journal magazine.