BANKING AND FINANCE

Dodd Makes the Case for Dodd-Frank

Updated: October 24, 2011 | 8:46 a.m.
October 24, 2011 | 8:42 a.m.

Chris Dodd (D-CT) speaks at news conference about the financial rescue bill passed in the Senate at the Capitol on October 1, 2008. (Liz Lynch)

Bashing last year's Dodd-Frank financial reform law has become something of a sport on the GOP campaign trail. Critics charge that the bill kills jobs through regulatory overreach.

But former Senate Banking Chairman Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., who sponsored the bill along with Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., says the people who bash the law are wrong about its “purpose and impact.” He addressed five "myths" about the bill in an op-ed published in The Washington Post:


  1. Dodd-Frank isn't making the economic slowdown worse. It was the opaque and reckless financial system that got the U.S. into the economic mess in the first place, Dodd said. Just 10 percent of the law’s provisions have been implemented -- hardly enough to justify charges that the law creates job-killing uncertainty, he said. There are plenty of other headwinds to economic recovery, including the housing market, budget deficit, and global sovereign debt crisis.
  2. The law isn't hurting small business or community banks; it is aimed at the largest, most complex Wall Street firms. That some regulators have become overzealous is a product of the post-crisis environment and not Dodd-Frank, Dodd wrote.
  3. Dodd-Frank didn't fail to reform Wall Street—it “fundamentally transformed our financial system,” Dodd said. The United States’s regulatory structure hadn’t been adequately update since the 1930s, and there is still more work to be done, he added.
  4. Congress hasn't ignored the housing crisis; it addressed problems with the mortgage-lending giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac through bipartisan regulation that created “a regulator with real teeth” and put Fannie and Freddie into conservatorship, Dodd said. The law also addressed risky housing-market practices.
  5. Dodd-Frank should not be repealed. “Whether or not you agree with the law’s provisions, repealing it would return us to a time in which nobody — not consumers, not regulators, not even other banks — knew what the Wall Street gamblers were doing until it was too late,” Dodd said. “It would destroy confidence in our markets and faith in our financial system, certainly hindering our recovery. It would again leave Americans at the mercy of those who have already ripped off too many families and businesses.”

Without the Dodd-Frank law, the U.S. -- and global -- economies risk an even greater meltdown, Dodd warned.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Special Section

A Gloomy Outlook for the Working-Class American

The U.S. economy once worked like a finely meshed machine. Not anymore.

Columns
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

GOP’s Switch on Financial Disclosure Wins Gold Medal in Hypocrisy Olympics

9:30 p.m.
The IRS scandal evolved from the broader reality that the GOP has changed its financing mantra from “disclosure” to “secrecy.”
Major Garrett: All Powers

Obama Pushes to Accommodate, Not Protect, Freedom of the Press

May 21, 2013
The Justice Department’s secret subpoena of AP phone logs begs questions about Obama’s attitude toward the First Amendment and government scrutiny.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
More Columns »
Get a trial subscription to National Journal magazine.