BUDGET

CBO Outlines 'Cliff' Options and Consequences

Updated: November 8, 2012 | 6:00 p.m.
November 8, 2012 | 5:30 p.m.

(AP Photo/Dan Nephin)

Two reports released on Thursday by the Congressional Budget Office give new ammunition to lawmakers in an already-contentious battle over the nation’s fiscal future.

Neither changes the overall picture: There will be dire economic consequences if Congress can’t agree on a plan to sidestep the combination of tax hikes and spending cuts known as the fiscal cliff that looms at the end of the year.

One of the reports released by the nonpartisan CBO, the official numbers-cruncher on Capitol Hill, warned that going over the cliff could send the country back into recession and cause unemployment to rise to 9.1 percent by the end of next year.

But the report also delved deeply into alternatives for policymakers, outlining how the tax hikes and spending cuts could be avoided and how they would impact employment and economic output. In doing so, the report provides fodder for lawmakers seeking to bolster their approach to deficit reduction.

One section that is sure to give Republicans some ammunition for the debate ahead is the CBO’s finding that extending income tax cuts for all Americans, including the wealthy, would boost GDP by a quarter of a percent more than if the cuts were extended only on income below $250,000. Republicans have strongly resisted President Obama’s calls to increase tax rates on the richest Americans.

“[K]eep in mind the economy might well grow less than 2% next year as is,” James Pethokoukis, a blogger for the conservative American Enterprise Institute, wrote in a blog post. “I think losing a quarter point is a pretty good chunk of growth.”

In another report released on Thursday, the CBO explored alternative policies that lawmakers could enact to reduce the deficit. In identifying changes to mandatory spending that would significantly reduce the deficit, for example, CBO offered three major options: repeal certain provisions of Obama’s landmark Affordable Care Act to reduce the deficit by $150 billion in 2020; either reduce Social Security benefits or raise the age for qualifying to save $30 billion; or allow the dreaded automatic spending cuts under sequestration to go into effect to reduce the budget by $15 billion in 2020.

With Congress so divided, any of those approaches to deficit reduction will be difficult to enact.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Special Section

A Gloomy Outlook for the Working-Class American

The U.S. economy once worked like a finely meshed machine. Not anymore.

Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

No Wonder Republican Criticism of Obama Isn’t Working

8:05 p.m.
They’re attacking the president where he’s least vulnerable at a time when they have minimal credibility.
Reid Wilson: On the Trail

Parties Push For House Retirements

May 23, 2013
Campaign committees utilize scare tactics to pressure members to step aside.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

GOP’s Switch on Financial Disclosure Wins Gold Medal in Hypocrisy Olympics

May 22, 2013
The IRS scandal evolved from the broader reality that the GOP has changed its financing mantra from “disclosure” to “secrecy.”
More Columns »
Get a trial subscription to National Journal magazine.