HEALTH CARE

Will Health Rebate Checks Help Obama?

Updated: September 26, 2012 | 10:11 a.m.
September 26, 2012 | 6:00 a.m.

President Barack Obama speaks at a campaign event at the Summerfest Grounds at Henry Maier Festival Park, Saturday, Sept. 22, 2012, in Milwaukee.  (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

For many insured Americans, the first tangible benefit of President Obama's signature health care law recently landed in their mailboxes: a check from their insurance company.

Some commentators this summer predicted the mailing of the checks could be a turning point for the controversial health law and perhaps give a political boost to Obama in his reelection bid.

“There are a variety of incremental ways that people are learning that the Affordable Care Act will be helpful to them,” said Ron Pollack, the president of Families USA, a liberal health care advocacy group. “The rebate checks will be a part of that.”

Still, despite that enthusiasm, the arrival of the rebates is unlikely to shift public perceptions in a major way. The policy has affected only a small percentage of Americans, not everyone is getting a direct payment, and the average size of the rebates is modest.

The health reform law limits how much of their customers’ premiums they can pocket for overhead and profits. Under the law, insurers must pay either 80 or 85 cents of every dollar on medical care. The insurers who fail to meet this target—called a medical loss ratio—are required to give their customers a refund for the difference and send them a letter specifying that the rebate is thanks to the health reform law.

Nationwide, the total rebates sound large. The Health and Human Services Department says that insurers owe Americans a total of $1.1 billion. But that number gets smaller once it’s spread out. Just under 13 million policy holders got rebates, about 5 percent of the U.S. population, or 10 percent of all households. The average refund was $151, but many Americans who get insurance through their employer received only a fraction of the total refund amount. (Washington, D.C., residents were more likely than most to get a rebate. Seventy-eight percent of employees working for large businesses were eligible.)

Many individual beneficiaries were delighted to get a refund. “It was like, finally, I’m not asked to shell out more money for health insurance,” said Morgan Theriot, 43, a self-employed human resources consultant from Silver Spring, Md., who got a $260 rebate check last month. “Finally, something is due back to me.”

But not everyone who got a check is now singing the praises of the health care law. Theriot said she had a client who was opposed to the law and got a $300 check. That woman said she’d be making a $300 donation to the Republican Party.

Not everyone is getting a check, either. People who buy their own policies, a small fraction of the market, will get a rebate directly from their insurer. But insurers will send rebates to employers who provide coverage for their workers. By law, employers are required to use the money to benefit their employees, but they have used a variety of strategies to do so, according to Tracy Watts, a partner at the employee benefits consultancy Mercer.

“In terms of employers’ actions, it is a mixed bag,” Watts said. “Some have actually cut checks and sent them to employees. Some have given a premium credit. And some have given employees extra money in their paycheck. I’m aware of one employer who put the money into a wellness fund that benefits employees.”

Watts said that many employers passing rebates along to their workers are not handing over the full amount. Since employees, on average, pay about a quarter of their insurance premiums, employers are tending to refund a prorated amount, a fraction of the average $151 amount.

Polling from the Kaiser Family Foundation suggests that some combination of news reports and letters in the mail has raised awareness of the law’s provision. In its August Health Tracking Poll, 42 percent of those asked knew about the refund provision, up from 35 percent in March. Sixty-two percent had a favorable view of the rebate provision.

Cynthia Cox, a policy analyst at Kaiser who has studied the issue, said this evidence suggests that the word is getting out about a popular provision. “More people may be aware of it than actually got the rebate,” she said.

 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

7:05 p.m.

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »
Get a trial subscription to National Journal magazine.