What Treasury's 'Least Harmful' Debt-Ceiling Response Looks Like

Updated: January 17, 2013 | 10:51 a.m.
January 17, 2013 | 10:45 a.m.

If Congress misses the deadline for raising the country's borrowing limit, the Treasury Department may start playing catch-up on the nation's bills.

Since the end of 2012, when the federal government hit the $16.4 trillion legal limit on its borrowing, Treasury has been using "extraordinary measures" to pay the country's bills. But it will exhaust those tools sometime between mid-February and March 1. If there is no debt-ceiling increase, the federal government will start owing more money than it collects each day. The results would be messy and would grow messier each day that the saga dragged on.

The last time the nation faced this threat, in the summer of 2011, Treasury's staff felt that delaying payments was the "least harmful" of the "very bad options," according to a Treasury inspector general's report. The department would pay the first day's bills only once it collected enough to pay them all. Under such a plan, however, the delayed payments would cascade, increasing exponentially.

"Because the U.S. operates at a deficit, payment delays under such a regime would have quickly worsened each day the debt limit remained at its limit, potentially causing great hardships to millions of Americans and harm to the economy," the inspector general wrote in his report on the 2011 debt-ceiling fight.

On Wednesday, the Bipartisan Policy Center think tank sketched out what this could look like. If the country reaches the debt ceiling on Feb. 15, the first day in the BPC's prediction, the bills owed that day would be delayed by five days. The seventh day's bills would be delayed by a week. By day 15, money owed would take half-a-month to be paid out.

It may not sound terrible, but the consequences could be severe, the BPC explains:

"Both the first- and second-order effects of such a delay would be very tangible: A senior who depends on Social Security benefits and has no other source of income might be unable to pay rent when due; a physician who treats many Medicare and Medicaid patients may be unable to meet payroll for nurses and administrative staff; a small government contractor may be unable to pay a subcontractor on time; a family depending on its tax refund to make a credit-card payment might incur a substantial interest expense; and a member of the military whose paycheck is delayed might miss a mortgage payment, incurring penalties."

Treasury officials have not spoken in public about options they would consider to manage the debt-ceiling problem, but staff told the inspector general that in 2011 they viewed delaying payments as the best of the terrible options. 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:49 p.m.

Latest Response by Dave McCurdy: Natural Gas Market Will Find Balance

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

4:24 p.m.

Latest Response by Keith Laughlin: We Need a New Policy for a New Day

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

3:21 p.m.

Latest Response by Tim Peckinpaugh: LNG Exports: Let the Market Decide

More Expert Opinions »
Get a trial subscription to National Journal magazine.