Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Little Sympathy for Feds' Arguments in Ariz. Immigration Case Little Sympathy for Feds' Arguments in Ariz. Immigration Case

This ad will end in seconds
 
Close X

Not a member? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation
 

 

Policy / Immigration

Little Sympathy for Feds' Arguments in Ariz. Immigration Case

Charles Balogh, from Alexandria, Va., demonstrates in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, Wednesday, April 25, 2012, as the court holds a hearing on Arizona's "show me your papers" immigration law.   (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

photo of Fawn Johnson
April 25, 2012

Supreme Court justices showed little sympathy for the federal government’s argument that the “show me your papers” provision of Arizona’s immigration enforcement law is invalid, making it appear likely the high court will allow that part of the law to stand. 

(PICTURES: Scenes from Outside the Court)

In Wednesday’s oral argument in one of the most watched immigration cases in 10 years, Justice Antonin Scalia all but laughed the federal government’s lawyer out of the courtroom when he suggested that Arizona police officers were somehow deterring the federal government from enforcing immigration laws by simply asking federal officers whether a person they stop is illegal. Scalia demanded that Justice Department Solicitor General Donald Verrilli cite “any other case” in which a state law can be preempted for “interfering with an attorney general’s enforcement discretion… That’s an extraordinary statement.”

 

(RELATED: Live Chat with Fawn Johnson at 3 p.m.)

Chief Justice John Roberts noted the Arizona law only allows legal status checks if the police officer has pulled over a person for some other reason. The Arizona officer is simply alerting the federal government to an illegal alien’s presence. “It seems to me the federal government just doesn’t want to know who’s here or not,” Roberts said.

Even Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who offered the most sympathy for the government’s position, pointed out to Verrilli that his argument “isn’t selling very well”—namely that a systematic system of status checks is somehow different from the current ad hoc one.

(RELATED: Immigration Case Is Just the Beginning)

The papers provision is one of four in question in the case. The others involve warrantless arrests, ID requirements, and undocumented people seeking jobs. The justices were less harsh about the government’s objections to the other provisions, making it increasingly likely that the court will rule separately on different portions of the law. 

 

 

Job Board
Search Jobs
Digital and Content Manager, E4C
American Society of Civil Engineers | New York, NY
PRODUCT REVIEW ENGINEER
American Society of Civil Engineers | CA
Neighborhood Traffic Safety Services Intern
American Society of Civil Engineers | Bellevue, WA
United Technologies Research Fellow
American Society of Civil Engineers | New York, NY
Process Engineering Co-op
American Society of Civil Engineers | Conshohocken, PA
Electrical Engineer Co-op
American Society of Civil Engineers | Findlay, OH
Application Engineer/Developer INTERN - Complex Fluids
American Society of Civil Engineers | Brisbane, CA
Application Engineer - Internships CAE/CFD Metro Detroit
American Society of Civil Engineers | Livonia, MI
Chief Geoscientist
American Society of Civil Engineers
Application Engineer - Internships CAE/CFD Metro Boston
American Society of Civil Engineers | Burlington, MA
Professional Development Program Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Farmington Hills, MI
Civil Enginering Intern - Water/Wastewater/Site-Development
American Society of Civil Engineers | Sacramento, CA
Staff Accountant
American Society of Civil Engineers | Englewood, CO
Biomedical Service Internship Position
American Society of Civil Engineers | Flint, MI
 
Comments
comments powered by Disqus