ECONOMY

In New Survey, Executives Pick Romney for Growth

Updated: October 19, 2012 | 3:44 p.m.
October 19, 2012 | 12:01 p.m.

Many business executives view Republican Mitt Romney as the candidate whose policies would set the stage for better economic growth, according to a survey of 501 businesspeople, but their ideas for boosting jobs growth included those put forth by both Democrats and Republicans.

Some 54 percent of respondents—a group that includes CEOs, presidents, and managing directors—said that Romney's election would be better for the growth and success of their business, while just 20 percent said the same of President Obama, according to the results of the survey conducted by job-placement firm Adecco. Thirteen percent said neither candidate was good for growth. In a separate question, 62 percent of executives said Obama was not doing all he could to help businesses grow.

Providing incentives for business hiring was cited most often as a policy a new president should implement to create jobs, followed closely by investing in infrastructure projects and reforming bureaucratic processes for businesses. Both Obama and Romney have proposed a tax incentive for businesses that hire the long-term unemployed. Obama has also repeatedly touted the importance of infrastructure investment in speeches and statements, while Romney has put an emphasis on streamlining regulations.

But the election and the uncertainty surrounding it hasn't affected investing for most: 62 percent of executives surveyed said they were investing just the same, while 35 percent said they were holding back to see who wins.

Health care costs were the most frequently cited business challenge, followed by salaries and compensation. Nearly half of respondents, 45 percent, said hiring was not affected by the passage of the Affordable Care Act, Obama’s landmark health care law. Some 35 percent said it had affected hiring.

Almost half of the executives, 47 percent, expect profits to rise in the next year, with 18 percent predicting a decline.

The telephone survey was conducted between Oct. 2 and Oct. 8 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.37 percentage points.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »
Get a trial subscription to National Journal magazine.