ECONOMY

Fed Gloomier on Economic Forecast

Updated: December 12, 2012 | 2:47 p.m.
December 12, 2012 | 2:26 p.m.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke speaks during a news conference at the Federal Reserve Board in Washington, Wednesday, Dec. 12, 2012. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

The Federal Reserve on Wednesday issued a slightly more pessimistic forecast for economic growth and a slightly less pessimistic one for unemployment in 2013.

The latest economic projections of the Fed’s policy-setting committee show an economy growing between 2.3 and 3 percent in 2013, a slight downgrade from its September forecast of 2.5 to 3 percent. 

On unemployment, the reverse happened: The central bank now expects an unemployment rate between 7.4 and 7.7 percent next year, a slight improvement from its September projection range of 7.6 to 7.9 percent. The forecast, however, doesn’t mark a significant improvement from the current unemployment rate of 7.7 percent.

The Fed launched a fresh round of asset purchases on Wednesday, a move sure to raise concerns of risking higher inflation, and indicated a willingness to keep interest rates low even as projections for inflation slightly surpass its long-run target of 2 percent. But the central bank slightly lowered its projections for inflation over the next three years in the economic forecasts and said that its longer-run expectation for inflation remained steady at 2 percent.

One of the big steps the Fed took in a separate policy statement on Wednesday was to change its guidance for how long it expects to keep the federal funds rate — its key policy lever — exceptionally low.

The central bank had based its guidance on the calendar and most recently said it expected to keep the rate low through mid-2015. On Wednesday, the Fed tied its forecast for the rate to economic conditions, but in the bank’s economic projections it was clear that the majority of the policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee still expects policy to be firmed in 2015.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


More By This Writer
Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

7:05 p.m.

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »
Get a trial subscription to National Journal magazine.