ECONOMY

Fed Gloomier on Economic Forecast

Updated: December 12, 2012 | 2:47 p.m.
December 12, 2012 | 2:26 p.m.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke speaks during a news conference at the Federal Reserve Board in Washington, Wednesday, Dec. 12, 2012. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

The Federal Reserve on Wednesday issued a slightly more pessimistic forecast for economic growth and a slightly less pessimistic one for unemployment in 2013.

The latest economic projections of the Fed’s policy-setting committee show an economy growing between 2.3 and 3 percent in 2013, a slight downgrade from its September forecast of 2.5 to 3 percent. 

On unemployment, the reverse happened: The central bank now expects an unemployment rate between 7.4 and 7.7 percent next year, a slight improvement from its September projection range of 7.6 to 7.9 percent. The forecast, however, doesn’t mark a significant improvement from the current unemployment rate of 7.7 percent.

The Fed launched a fresh round of asset purchases on Wednesday, a move sure to raise concerns of risking higher inflation, and indicated a willingness to keep interest rates low even as projections for inflation slightly surpass its long-run target of 2 percent. But the central bank slightly lowered its projections for inflation over the next three years in the economic forecasts and said that its longer-run expectation for inflation remained steady at 2 percent.

One of the big steps the Fed took in a separate policy statement on Wednesday was to change its guidance for how long it expects to keep the federal funds rate — its key policy lever — exceptionally low.

The central bank had based its guidance on the calendar and most recently said it expected to keep the rate low through mid-2015. On Wednesday, the Fed tied its forecast for the rate to economic conditions, but in the bank’s economic projections it was clear that the majority of the policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee still expects policy to be firmed in 2015.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Josh Kraushaar: Against the Grain

Why Democrats Are Already Jumping Aboard the Hillary Clinton Bandwagon

1:57 p.m.
Claire McCaskill's endorsement was a bow to reality: Democrats don't want to challenge Clinton in 2016.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

No Guarantee of a GOP Senate Majority

7:30 p.m.
The disproportionate exposure for the chamber’s Democrats is very clear. But can Republicans capitalize on their opportunities?
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

Why We Lack Good Privacy Guidelines

June 13, 2013
Technology innovations have served to strip away privacy. They could also be the key to restoring it.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Hands-Free Won't Cut It

3:22 p.m.

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Consider the Opportunity Before Us

Energy Experts

What's the Future of Electric Cars?

June 17, 2013

Latest Response by Phyllis Cuttino: TBD

Energy Experts

What's the Future of Electric Cars?

June 14, 2013

Latest Response by Brigham McCown: Electric Cars and Their Dirty Secret

More Expert Opinions »
Get a trial subscription to National Journal magazine.