ENVIRONMENT

EPA to Delay Climate-Change Rules

Updated: September 15, 2011 | 2:49 p.m.
September 15, 2011 | 9:50 a.m.

PASADENA, TX - SEPTEMBER 23: Smoke billows from the stacks at a refinery September 23, 2005 in Pasadena, Texas. Hurricane Rita is expected to hit the Texas coast near Baytown early morning on September 24.   (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images) (Scott Olson/Getty Images)

The Obama administration will delay issuing its politically explosive climate-change rules for the second time.

The Environmental Protection Agency had said it would issue the rules, which would require power plants to slash their greenhouse-gas emissions, by Sept. 30.

But EPA spokeswoman Betsaida Alcantara confirmed to National Journal Thursday that EPA would miss its Sept. 30 deadline. She said the agency would "soon" issue a new schedule, but did not have details. 

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson first mentioned the delay at a San Francisco event on Wednesday, Reuters reported. "Although we are not going to make the date at the end of the month, we are still working and will be shortly announcing a new schedule,” Jackson said.

A delay had seemed increasingly likely, as National Journal reported last week, because EPA has not yet submitted the rules to the White House Office of Management and Budget. Rules are typically in OMB’s hands for months before EPA can announce them.

In response to litigation brought by about a dozen states and three environmental groups, EPA had originally planned to issue the standards on July 26. But on June 13, the agency announced it had reached an agreement with the parties in the lawsuit to extend that deadline until Sept. 30. In that agreement, EPA reiterated its commitment to finalizing the rules by May 26, 2012.

Earlier this month, amid intense business and political pressures, President Obama shelved his administration’s controversial ground-level ozone standard for at least two years. The delay infuriated his environmental base but was applauded by many business leaders and congressional Republicans.

But it is likely that EPA is delaying the climate-change rule more for practical reasons than for political ones  lobbyists close to EPA tell National Journal. At issue is the agency's inability to work through all comments and craft the proposal on time, they said.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

7:05 p.m.

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

11:03 a.m.

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »
Get a trial subscription to National Journal magazine.