ENVIRONMENT

EPA to Delay Climate-Change Rules

Scott Olson/Getty Images

PASADENA, TX - SEPTEMBER 23: Smoke billows from the stacks at a refinery September 23, 2005 in Pasadena, Texas. Hurricane Rita is expected to hit the Texas coast near Baytown early morning on September 24.   (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)

Updated: September 15, 2011 | 2:49 p.m.
September 15, 2011 | 9:50 a.m.

The Obama administration will delay issuing its politically explosive climate-change rules for the second time.

The Environmental Protection Agency had said it would issue the rules, which would require power plants to slash their greenhouse-gas emissions, by Sept. 30.

But EPA spokeswoman Betsaida Alcantara confirmed to National Journal Thursday that EPA would miss its Sept. 30 deadline. She said the agency would "soon" issue a new schedule, but did not have details. 

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson first mentioned the delay at a San Francisco event on Wednesday, Reuters reported. "Although we are not going to make the date at the end of the month, we are still working and will be shortly announcing a new schedule,” Jackson said.

A delay had seemed increasingly likely, as National Journal reported last week, because EPA has not yet submitted the rules to the White House Office of Management and Budget. Rules are typically in OMB’s hands for months before EPA can announce them.

In response to litigation brought by about a dozen states and three environmental groups, EPA had originally planned to issue the standards on July 26. But on June 13, the agency announced it had reached an agreement with the parties in the lawsuit to extend that deadline until Sept. 30. In that agreement, EPA reiterated its commitment to finalizing the rules by May 26, 2012.

Earlier this month, amid intense business and political pressures, President Obama shelved his administration’s controversial ground-level ozone standard for at least two years. The delay infuriated his environmental base but was applauded by many business leaders and congressional Republicans.

But it is likely that EPA is delaying the climate-change rule more for practical reasons than for political ones  lobbyists close to EPA tell National Journal. At issue is the agency's inability to work through all comments and craft the proposal on time, they said.

Want to stay ahead of the curve? Sign up for National Journal’s AM & PM Must Reads. News and analysis to ensure you don’t miss a thing.

Leave a Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
  • NationalJournal on Twitter
  • NationalJournal on Facebook
  • NationalJournal on Tumblr
  • NationalJournal's RSS Feeds
  • NationalJournal's Email Newsletters
  • NationalJournal on iPhone and iPad
Columns
Reid Wilson: On the Trail

Buy Early and Often

9:30 p.m.
With so many candidates, super PACs, and party committees chasing limited TV ad time, the rules of the road have changed. An insider’s guide.
Josh Kraushaar: Against the Grain

The Emerging Democratic Divide

May 22, 2012
The brouhaha over a moderate New Jersey mayor’s comments has aggravated tensions that have been growing within the party’s coalition.
Charlie Cook: Charlie Cook's Off to the Races

If It Hits the Fan

May 21, 2012
Europe’s economy is in a tailspin and China’s is slowing. Our political system is a mess. Who are voters going to blame if it all goes bad? Not just Obama.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Not Waiting for the Feds

5:54 p.m.

Latest Response by James Corless: Local Voters Need a Partner

Energy Experts

Powering Our Military: What's the Role of Clean Energy?

12:59 p.m.

Latest Response by Tom Buis: American Families Need American Fuel

Energy Experts

Powering Our Military: What's the Role of Clean Energy?

10:35 a.m.

Latest Response by Keith Crane: DoD Renewable Fuels Investment Premature

More Expert Opinions »
Get a trial subscription to National Journal magazine.