ENVIRONMENT

Court Upholds EPA Climate-Change Rules

Updated: June 26, 2012 | 11:25 a.m.
June 26, 2012 | 11:24 a.m.

A federal appeals court on Tuesday upheld the Environmental Protection Agency's regulations to reduce greenhouse gases that contribute to climate change, throwing out legal challenges by states and industry groups that argued the EPA had exceeded its authority under the Clean Air Act by declaring that carbon emissions endanger public health.

The decision is a huge victory for the administration’s efforts to address climate change in the face of congressional gridlock on the issue and increasing skepticism among Republicans that climate change is a problem the country needs to address.

The rule will undoubtedly trigger an intense backlash from industry and congressional Republicans who charge the EPA is trying to enact climate-change policy through backdoor administrative actions since Congress hasn’t acted.

The ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld four major aspects of the rules that a large coalition of states, industry groups, and companies had challenged. In perhaps the most surprising part of the ruling, the court upheld the EPA's controversial “tailoring rule,” which the agency established so it could slowly phase in the greenhouse-gas rules under the Clean Air Act. Even the administration’s own lawyers privately worried about the legality of this provision because it stretched the definitions of the Clean Air Act.

The court also upheld the linchpin of the legal challenges—EPA’s “endangerment finding.” This is a scientific conclusion the agency reached in December 2009 that greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane are a threat to human health and welfare and must be regulated under the Clean Air Act. EPA reached that conclusion in response to a 2007 Supreme Court ruling that the agency had the right to regulate greenhouse-gas emissions if it found, as it later did, that those emissions were a threat to public health and welfare.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

Why We Lack Good Privacy Guidelines

June 13, 2013
Technology innovations have served to strip away privacy. They could also be the key to restoring it.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Why Obama’s Approval Rating Isn’t Higher

June 13, 2013
Constant controversies could prevent the president from getting much credit for the improving economy.
Josh Kraushaar: Against the Grain

Three Signs Republicans Haven't Learned Any Lessons From 2012

June 13, 2013
After last year's drubbing, Republicans vowed to change their ways. But as 2013 wears on, they’re sticking to the script that got them in trouble.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's the Future of Electric Cars?

3:33 p.m.

Latest Response by Phyllis Cuttino: TBD

Energy Experts

What's the Future of Electric Cars?

June 14, 2013

Latest Response by Brigham McCown: Electric Cars and Their Dirty Secret

Transportation Experts

It's an East Coast Thing

June 14, 2013

Latest Response by Ed Wytkind: Take Away Ideology, Amtrak is a Highway

More Expert Opinions »
Get a trial subscription to National Journal magazine.