DOMESTIC POLICY

As Sad as It Is, Don't Expect Today's Shooting to Change Minds on Gun Control

Updated: December 14, 2012 | 5:09 p.m.
December 14, 2012 | 3:02 p.m.

Virginia Tech. Tuscon. Aurora. Milwaukee. Now, Newtown.

As Reid Wilson writes in his column today, these incidents of mass and public tragedy renew conversation on gun control. But talk is largely all there is.

Wilson writes:

Obama has been given several sad opportunities to address gun violence. In Tucson, he spoke of "a national conversation" commencing.... After an attack on a Sikh temple outside Milwaukee, Obama said similar events "are happening with too much regularity for us not to do some soul-searching to examine additional ways that we can reduce violence."

But that soul-searching did not happen in Obama's first term.

But it isn't just policy that remains stagnant; it's public perception of guns as well. The chart above, released in July from the Pew Research Center, shows that before and after the tragedies in Virgina, Arizona, and Colorado, public perception of guns and gun rights did not change to a significant degree.

What also is clear from the Pew report is that Democrats and Republicans are deeply divided on gun-control issues. Republicans "prioritize gun rights by a 71 percent to 26 percent margin, while Democrats prioritize gun control by a 72 percent to 21 percent margin."

Other stats:

  • Two-thirds of Americans say that mass shootings are "isolated acts of troubled individuals," while one-fourth say they reflect broader problems in society.
  • Support for gun control has fallen in recent years. In 2000, 66 percent of Americans thought it was more important to control guns than to protect the Second Amendment. In 2012, 47 percent of Americans thought so.

Read more at Pew.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Josh Kraushaar: Against the Grain

Why Democrats Are Already Jumping Aboard the Hillary Clinton Bandwagon

1:57 p.m.
Claire McCaskill's endorsement was a bow to reality: Democrats don't want to challenge Clinton in 2016.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

No Guarantee of a GOP Senate Majority

June 17, 2013
The disproportionate exposure for the chamber’s Democrats is very clear. But can Republicans capitalize on their opportunities?
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

Why We Lack Good Privacy Guidelines

June 13, 2013
Technology innovations have served to strip away privacy. They could also be the key to restoring it.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Hands-Free Won't Cut It

3:22 p.m.

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Consider the Opportunity Before Us

Energy Experts

What's the Future of Electric Cars?

June 17, 2013

Latest Response by Phyllis Cuttino: TBD

Energy Experts

What's the Future of Electric Cars?

June 14, 2013

Latest Response by Brigham McCown: Electric Cars and Their Dirty Secret

More Expert Opinions »
Get a trial subscription to National Journal magazine.