DOMESTIC POLICY

As Sad as It Is, Don't Expect Today's Shooting to Change Minds on Gun Control

Updated: December 14, 2012 | 5:09 p.m.
December 14, 2012 | 3:02 p.m.

Virginia Tech. Tuscon. Aurora. Milwaukee. Now, Newtown.

As Reid Wilson writes in his column today, these incidents of mass and public tragedy renew conversation on gun control. But talk is largely all there is.

Wilson writes:

Obama has been given several sad opportunities to address gun violence. In Tucson, he spoke of "a national conversation" commencing.... After an attack on a Sikh temple outside Milwaukee, Obama said similar events "are happening with too much regularity for us not to do some soul-searching to examine additional ways that we can reduce violence."

But that soul-searching did not happen in Obama's first term.

But it isn't just policy that remains stagnant; it's public perception of guns as well. The chart above, released in July from the Pew Research Center, shows that before and after the tragedies in Virgina, Arizona, and Colorado, public perception of guns and gun rights did not change to a significant degree.

What also is clear from the Pew report is that Democrats and Republicans are deeply divided on gun-control issues. Republicans "prioritize gun rights by a 71 percent to 26 percent margin, while Democrats prioritize gun control by a 72 percent to 21 percent margin."

Other stats:

  • Two-thirds of Americans say that mass shootings are "isolated acts of troubled individuals," while one-fourth say they reflect broader problems in society.
  • Support for gun control has fallen in recent years. In 2000, 66 percent of Americans thought it was more important to control guns than to protect the Second Amendment. In 2012, 47 percent of Americans thought so.

Read more at Pew.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

GOP’s Switch on Financial Disclosure Wins Gold Medal in Hypocrisy Olympics

9:30 p.m.
The IRS scandal evolved from the broader reality that the GOP has changed its financing mantra from “disclosure” to “secrecy.”
Major Garrett: All Powers

Obama Pushes to Accommodate, Not Protect, Freedom of the Press

May 21, 2013
The Justice Department’s secret subpoena of AP phone logs begs questions about Obama’s attitude toward the First Amendment and government scrutiny.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

11:51 a.m.

Latest Response by Bill Cooper: U.S. Should Quickly Approve Other Apps

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

11:21 a.m.

Latest Response by Margot Anderson: U.S. Prices To Impact Natural-Gas Exports More

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

10:43 p.m.

Latest Response by Gabriel Roth: But do we not drive to save time?

More Expert Opinions »
Get a trial subscription to National Journal magazine.