Senators Drafting Bill That Could Extend Life of Chemical Security Program

None

Search and rescue workers comb through what remains of a 50-unit apartment building the day after an explosion at the West Fertilizer Company destroyed the building on April 18, 2013, in West, Texas. Senators are working on draft legislation that could extend the life of a controversial Homeland Security Department program meant to protect such facilities against terrorist attacks or sabotage.
National Journal
Douglas P. Guarino
June 27, 2014, 10:50 a.m.

Sen­at­ors are work­ing on a bill that could ex­tend the life of a con­tro­ver­sial chem­ic­al se­cur­ity pro­gram, but de­tails still re­main un­der wraps.

The Sen­ate Home­land Se­cur­ity Com­mit­tee was to mark up what it is call­ing the “Pro­tect­ing Amer­ic­an Chem­ic­al Fa­cil­it­ies from At­tack Act of 2014” on June 25, but con­sid­er­a­tion of the meas­ure was ul­ti­mately de­leted, without ex­plan­a­tion, from the agenda of a com­mit­tee busi­ness meet­ing that day.

A spokes­wo­man for the pan­el, which is chaired by Sen­at­or Tom Carp­er (D-Del.), de­clined to provide de­tails re­gard­ing the le­gis­la­tion and how soon it might be un­veiled.

Carp­er’s com­mit­tee held a hear­ing on the Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment’s Chem­ic­al Fa­cil­ity Anti-Ter­ror­ism Stand­ards on May 14. Dur­ing the hear­ing, Carp­er said a bill ap­proved in April by the House Home­land Se­cur­ity Com­mit­tee could serve “as a mod­el for [his pan­el’s] work on this is­sue between now and the end of the year.”

The House le­gis­la­tion is backed by DHS of­fi­cials, largely be­cause it would provide mul­ti­year au­thor­iz­a­tion for a pro­gram that thus far has been re­newed an­nu­ally through the con­gres­sion­al ap­pro­pri­ations pro­cess. DHS of­fi­cials have said un­cer­tainty stem­ming from year-to-year re­new­als has made it more dif­fi­cult to reg­u­late chem­ic­al fa­cil­it­ies.

The House bill does not in­clude pro­vi­sions that would give the de­part­ment the au­thor­ity to re­quire spe­cif­ic se­cur­ity up­grades at fa­cil­it­ies. So-called “in­her­ently safer tech­no­logy” re­quire­ments are favored by labor uni­on of­fi­cials, en­vir­on­ment­al­ists and some Demo­crats, but are op­posed by Re­pub­lic­ans and in­dustry of­fi­cials.

The House le­gis­la­tion would also con­tin­ue an ex­emp­tion for wa­ter treat­ment fa­cil­it­ies that has been cri­ti­cized by some Demo­crats and act­iv­ist groups. An in­ter­agency re­port re­leased by the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion last month urged Con­gress to end the ex­emp­tion.

Carp­er, dur­ing the May 14 hear­ing, did not in­dic­ate wheth­er a Sen­ate bill might in­clude ad­di­tion­al pro­vi­sions meant to ad­dress any of these con­tro­ver­sies, but he did ac­know­ledge some of the CFATS pro­gram’s per­ceived short­com­ings.

Last year’s fatal ex­plo­sion at a fer­til­izer plant in West, Texas “showed that, in some cases, the De­part­ment likely isn’t aware of some fa­cil­it­ies that should be sub­mit­ting in­form­a­tion to the pro­gram but are not,” Carp­er said.

The non­par­tis­an Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice “and oth­er ex­perts have also ex­pressed con­cern that the de­part­ment’s meth­od for as­sess­ing risk for a chem­ic­al fa­cil­ity is in­com­plete,” Carp­er noted.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×