Obama on Iraq: We Will Be Prepared to Take Targeted Military Action

“American forces will not be returning to combat in Iraq,” Obama said, “but we will help Iraqis as they take the fight to terrorists who threaten the Iraqi people.”

U.S. President Barack Obama speaks during an East Room event at the White House June 9, 2014 in Washington, DC. President Obama signed a presidential memorandum on 'reducing the burden of student loan debt.'
National Journal
Kaveh Waddell Brian Resnick
June 19, 2014, 9:41 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama an­nounced Thursday af­ter­noon that the U.S. will be step­ping up its in­tel­li­gence-gath­er­ing and mil­it­ary sup­port to help the Ir­aqis, but will not em­ploy com­bat forces out­right to deal with the crisis in the coun­try.

However, he said the U.S. “will be pre­pared to take tar­geted and pre­cise mil­it­ary ac­tion if and when we de­term­ine that the situ­ation on the ground re­quires it.”

In the last few weeks, a Sunni mil­it­ant group known as the Is­lam­ic State of Ir­aq and Syr­ia has taken a num­ber of ma­jor cit­ies in the north­ern and west­ern re­gions of Ir­aq. The group’s mil­it­ary cam­paign has car­ried IS­IS fight­ers with­in strik­ing dis­tance of the Ir­aqi cap­it­al of Bagh­dad, and re­cent gains in north­w­est Ir­aq have brought the group closer to its goal of es­tab­lish­ing con­trol over a con­tigu­ous area span­ning the Ir­aqi-Syr­i­an bor­der.

“Amer­ic­an forces will not be re­turn­ing to com­bat in Ir­aq,” Obama said, “but we will help Ir­aqis as they take the fight to ter­ror­ists who threaten the Ir­aqi people, the re­gion, and Amer­ic­an in­terests as well.”

Pres­id­ent Obama met with con­gres­sion­al lead­ers Wed­nes­day to dis­cuss op­tions for Amer­ic­an as­sist­ance in Ir­aq. In the meet­ing, the pres­id­ent prom­ised to keep Con­gress in­formed as the situ­ation evolves. In a state­ment after the meet­ing, Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id said the pres­id­ent “is not cur­rently con­sid­er­ing ac­tions that would re­quire con­gres­sion­al ap­prov­al but was very clear that he would con­sult with Con­gress if that changed.”

The pres­id­ent framed Amer­ic­an ac­tion in Ir­aq in terms of na­tion­al se­cur­ity rather than in terms of hu­man­it­ari­an con­cern. “It is in our na­tion­al se­cur­ity in­terests not to see an all-out civil war in­side of Ir­aq,” Obama said. “Not just for hu­man­it­ari­an reas­ons but be­cause that ul­ti­mately can be destabil­iz­ing throughout the re­gion.” The spread of this con­flict would pose a threat to re­gion­al al­lies, the pres­id­ent said, and to the glob­al en­ergy mar­ket.

Ir­aq’s em­battled prime min­is­ter, Nuri al-Ma­liki, may be on his last legs. With Amer­ic­an sup­port, Ir­aqi can­did­ates, Sunni and Shiite both, are man­euv­er­ing to re­place the Shiite prime min­is­ter, whose sec­tari­an policies have been blamed for the cur­rent chaos in the coun­try.

“It’s not the place for the United States to choose Ir­aq’s lead­ers,” Obama said Thursday. “It is clear, though, that only lead­ers that can gov­ern with an in­clus­ive agenda are go­ing to be able to truly bring the Ir­aqi people to­geth­er and help them through this crisis.” This echoes Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry’s po­s­i­tion that any U.S. in­ter­ven­tion would be fo­cused on the wel­fare of the Ir­aqi state, not on prop­ping up the cur­rent prime min­is­ter.

On Wed­nes­day, Ir­a­ni­an Pres­id­ent Has­san Rouh­ani an­nounced that Ir­an “will not hes­it­ate” to in­volve it­self in Ir­aq in or­der to pro­tect sites holy to Shiite Muslims. Ir­an is a ma­jor back­er of Ma­liki’s gov­ern­ment in Ir­aq.

Obama warned that Ir­a­ni­an in­volve­ment could be harm­ful if it took on a sec­tari­an tint. “If Ir­an is com­ing in solely as an armed force on be­half of the [Shiites],” Obama said, “then that prob­ably wor­sens the situ­ation and the pro­spect for gov­ern­ment form­a­tion that would ac­tu­ally be con­struct­ive over the long term.”

The U.S. and Ir­an have dis­cussed the pos­sib­il­ity of co­oper­at­ing in Ir­aq to drive back IS­IS forces, but the two are less likely to share in­terests if the U.S. turns away from sup­port­ing Ma­liki. Con­gres­sion­al lead­ers have spoken out against co­oper­at­ing with Ir­an: House Speak­er John Boehner and House Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi both warned against any col­lab­or­a­tion.

But for Obama, co­oper­at­ing with Ir­an de­pends on the de­cisions of its lead­er­ship. “Just as Ir­aq’s lead­ers have to make de­cisions, I think Ir­an has heard from us,” Obama said.

This story is break­ing and may be up­dated.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×