Key U.S. Lawmaker: Special Funding for Nuclear Vessel Won’t Happen This Year

None

The Ohio-class ballistic-missile submarine USS West Virginia returns in February to Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay, Ga., following routine operations. A key U.S. lawmaker says the nuclear-armed submarines' replacements may get a special funding stream, but not anytime soon.
National Journal
Elaine M. Grossman
April 29, 2014, 10:26 a.m.

A key U.S. House pan­el lead­er says Con­gress won’t cre­ate a spe­cial fund­ing stream for nuc­le­ar-armed sub­mar­ines this year, but he thinks the idea of bank­rolling the ves­sels out­side of the Navy’s strained ship­build­ing budget is al­most cer­tain in the long term.

Rep­res­ent­at­ive Randy For­bes (R-Va.) told re­port­ers on Tues­day morn­ing that re­pla­cing today’s Ohio-class bal­list­ic-mis­sile ves­sels “is a na­tion­al stra­tegic con­cern” that can­not be al­lowed to fall vic­tim to an already un­der­fun­ded nav­al ship-pro­cure­ment plan in com­ing dec­ades.

That plan, by his es­tim­ates, is $4 bil­lion to $6 bil­lion short an­nu­ally.

Some Navy lead­ers and mem­bers of Con­gress have ad­voc­ated that as a “na­tion­al stra­tegic as­set,” the pur­chase of 12 new “SSBN(X)” sub­mar­ines armed ini­tially with Tri­dent D-5 nuc­le­ar-tipped mis­siles should have its own ded­ic­ated fund­ing source out­side of the ser­vice’s nor­mal budget.

The idea would be to help en­sure that this leg of the U.S. nuc­le­ar tri­ad con­tin­ues to be re­sourced, and is not cut to help fund oth­er Navy pri­or­it­ies in its plan to field 300-plus com­bat ves­sels.

Navy lead­ers have test­i­fied that the Ohio-class re­place­ment pro­gram is their top ship-con­struc­tion pri­or­ity, and they would cut pur­chases of oth­er ves­sels, if need be, to fund the nuc­le­ar-armed sub­mers­ibles. If the Ohio-class re­place­ment sub­mar­ine goes for­ward as planned un­der a single ship­build­ing budget, Navy brass have said they might be able to sus­tain a fleet of just 250 ves­sels.

However, For­bes sees a grow­ing need for U.S. seapower in the Asia-Pa­cific re­gion and around the globe. He said he can’t ima­gine how the Navy could real­ist­ic­ally fund the nuc­le­ar-equipped ves­sels — a pro­gram es­tim­ated at more than $90 bil­lion — and still have funds to buy enough of oth­er classes of re­quired war­ships.

“If you don’t do that [sep­ar­ate-fund­ing scheme], ba­sic­ally we’re go­ing to be tak­ing our en­tire ship­build­ing budget to do that [bal­list­ic-mis­sile sub­mar­ine], and that would be very, very dan­ger­ous for the coun­try,” said For­bes, who chairs the House Armed Ser­vices Seapower and Pro­jec­tion Forces Sub­com­mit­tee.

Speak­ing at a De­fense Writers Group break­fast, he said the pro­spects that Con­gress as a whole would sup­port a spe­cial fund­ing scheme for the “boomer” sub­mar­ines some­time in the fu­ture are “good be­cause I think we’re not go­ing to have a choice.”

For­bes blamed both Re­pub­lic­an and Demo­crat­ic law­makers, as they re­view and al­ter fed­er­al budgets, for hav­ing typ­ic­ally “reached up and grabbed” de­sired fund­ing num­bers and said “make this fit.” But “on na­tion­al de­fense you can’t do it,” he said.

The Navy es­tim­ates it will need an av­er­age of $16.8 bil­lion an­nu­ally — meas­ured in fisc­al 2013 dol­lars — to un­der­write its 30-year ship­build­ing plan, which is more than $2 bil­lion a year over his­tor­ic av­er­ages, ac­cord­ing to a re­cent Con­gres­sion­al Re­search Ser­vice re­port. The Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice says the Navy plan would ac­tu­ally re­quire $19.3 bil­lion on av­er­age each year, or $2.5 bil­lion more than the ser­vice’s es­tim­ates.

“I don’t think Con­gress is go­ing to want ship­build­ing to stop com­pletely,” For­bes said. “And yet, we’re not go­ing to let the most power­ful ves­sels we have in the world for na­tion­al de­fense not be [built].”

However, he said U.S. le­gis­lat­ors would likely “put it off un­til the last mo­ment,” as they tend to do on many mat­ters of pub­lic policy.

“We’re not there now,” said the law­maker, who has rep­res­en­ted Vir­gin­ia’s 4th Dis­trict since 2001. “I wish I could give you a timetable. I can’t. But I do be­lieve that’s the right thing to do, and we’re go­ing to con­tin­ue to push” the is­sue.

The Navy has re­ques­ted $1.2 bil­lion in SSBN(X) re­search and de­vel­op­ment funds for fisc­al 2015, and plans to be­gin build­ing the first such ves­sel in 2021. It is to be ready for field­ing a dec­ade later.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
22 hours ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×