Vets Bill Goes Down as Military Sexual-Assault Bills Come Up

Angry over process, Republicans withhold votes needed to get vets bill to the floor.

U.S. Bernard Sanders (I-VT) covers his face during a 2009 hearing. Sanders is considering introducing a bill that would end liability limits for the nuclear power industry in the event of a disaster.
National Journal
Stacy Kaper
Feb. 27, 2014, 7:37 a.m.

Re­pub­lic­ans scuttled a $21 bil­lion vet­er­ans’ pack­age in the Sen­ate on Thursday, but have agreed to al­low com­pet­ing mil­it­ary sexu­al-as­sault bills to move to the floor for votes.

The vet­er­ans’ bill from Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Ver­mont in­de­pend­ent, went down on a pro­ced­ur­al vote 56-41 be­cause Re­pub­lic­ans, denied the abil­ity to of­fer amend­ments, with­held the votes needed to get it to the floor.

Mean­while, long-stalled votes on com­pet­ing mil­it­ary sexu­al-as­sault le­gis­la­tion offered by Demo­crat­ic Sens. Kirsten Gil­librand of New York and Claire Mc­Caskill of Mis­souri are fi­nally ex­pec­ted to ad­vance.

After Re­pub­lic­ans ob­jec­ted to mov­ing for­ward with the bills earli­er in the week, Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id and Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell struck a deal late Wed­nes­day to ex­ped­ite de­bate and al­low the meas­ures to pro­ceed as early as next week.

The Gil­librand bill would re­form the mil­it­ary justice sys­tem by strip­ping com­mand­ers of the power to de­cide which sexu­al-as­sault cases are pro­sec­uted. Gil­librand has 55 votes lined up for her bill and could man­age to pass it if she can find 60 votes needed to get the le­gis­la­tion to the floor.

Mc­Caskill’s bill in­cludes a host of non­con­tro­ver­sial re­forms, in­clud­ing dis­al­low­ing a sol­dier’s good mil­it­ary char­ac­ter to be con­sidered in the de­fense of a sexu­al as­sault and meas­ures to make it easi­er for vic­tims to chal­lenge un­fair dis­charges from the ser­vice.

The Sanders bill ex­pands vet­er­ans’ be­ne­fits in edu­ca­tion and health care, and it would re­verse a cost-of-liv­ing ad­just­ment on mil­it­ary re­tir­ees’ pen­sions that was in­cluded in last year’s budget deal. Vet­er­ans’ groups strongly sup­port the le­gis­la­tion, and some cried foul at the closed pro­cess for com­plic­at­ing its chances.

Re­pub­lic­ans op­posed the bill’s off­set, which re­lied on sav­ings from the draw­down of the wars in Ir­aq and Afgh­anistan and wanted to of­fer al­tern­at­ives. But among their wish list was a vote on Ir­an sanc­tions, which Re­id said was not rel­ev­ant to the bill and would not be al­lowed.

“The Amer­ic­an Le­gion would very much like to have seen Re­id open up the bill to amend­ments, to help the bill get through the pro­cess,” said Louis Celli, a le­gis­lat­ive dir­ect­or with the group. “We would op­pose non-ger­mane amend­ments like Ir­an, but this par­tis­an­ship and games­man­ship has got to stop so that Amer­ic­an people can get the laws back that we need to help vet­er­ans.”

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×