Scientists Discover Fast-Acting Anthrax Identification Test

None

Global Security Newswire Staff
Feb. 27, 2014, 6:21 a.m.

Uni­versity of Mis­souri sci­ent­ists have dis­covered a new dia­gnost­ic pro­ced­ure that drastic­ally re­duces the time it takes to identi­fy the pres­ence of an­thrax.

Tests cur­rently used by emer­gency re­spon­ders to check for an­thrax in a cul­ture — ex­trac­ted from the en­vir­on­ment or a bioweapon-de­liv­ery device — can take as long as two days to re­turn res­ults.

The new de­vel­op­ment­al meth­od takes roughly five hours, which could al­low au­thor­it­ies to re­spond to a con­firmed bio­lo­gic­al-weapons in­cid­ent much more quickly, ac­cord­ing to a Wed­nes­day news re­lease from the uni­versity.

“Nor­mally to identi­fy wheth­er an or­gan­ism is present, you have to ex­tract the ma­ter­i­al, cul­ture it, and then pick colon­ies to ex­am­ine that might turn out to be an­thrax bac­teria,” George Stew­art, a med­ic­al bac­teri­olo­gist at the school’s Bond Life Sci­ences Cen­ter, said in provided com­ments. “Then you con­duct chem­ic­al test­ing which takes some time — a min­im­um of 24 to 48 hours. Us­ing this newly iden­ti­fied meth­od, we can re­duce that time to about five hours.”

The bi­o­tech­no­logy firm Guild BioS­ciences cre­ated a patho­gen called “bio­lu­min­es­cent re­port­er phage,” which Stew­art and his team in­jec­ted in­to samples. When an­thrax was present, the sample glowed. The re­search­ers learned the phage was cap­able of de­tect­ing small amounts of an­thrax spores and did not emit false alarms.

The U.S. Ag­ri­cul­ture De­part­ment-fun­ded meth­od also can identi­fy wheth­er an­thrax spores are act­ive, ac­cord­ing to Stew­art.

The pub­lic-private re­search team next plans to seek reg­u­lat­ory ap­prov­al from the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment so the dia­gnost­ic tech­no­logy can be de­veloped in­to a dis­trib­ut­able product.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
21 hours ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×