Lawmakers from Missile States Worry Pentagon Is Studying Closing Silos

None

Construction takes place in the late 1950s on silos that will eventually house U.S. intercontinental ballistic missiles. A number of lawmakers are concerned the Pentagon has begun the environmental studies necessary for shutting down some of the underground launch complexes for Minuteman 3 missiles.
National Journal
Rachel Oswald
Feb. 21, 2014, 9:53 a.m.

A group of law­makers from states that host stra­tegic nuc­le­ar mis­siles are con­cerned the Pentagon could be study­ing clos­ing down some of the weapon silos.

In the last day, mul­tiple let­ters from both cham­bers of Con­gress have been sent to U.S. De­fense Sec­ret­ary Chuck Hagel, de­mand­ing to know wheth­er his de­part­ment is vi­ol­at­ing re­cent fed­er­al law by con­duct­ing en­vir­on­ment­al stud­ies re­lated to the coun­try’s force of un­der­ground-based in­ter­con­tin­ent­al bal­list­ic mis­siles.

“We write to make very clear our strenu­ous op­pos­i­tion to any at­tempt by the De­part­ment of De­fense to cir­cum­vent ex­ist­ing law to pro­ceed with an En­vir­on­ment­al Im­pact Study or an En­vir­on­ment­al As­sess­ment on the elim­in­a­tion of Minute­man 3 silos,” reads one bi­par­tis­an let­ter from Sen­at­ors Jon Test­er (D-Mont.), John Ho­even (R-N.D.), Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) and John Walsh (D-Mont.).

Con­gress in its om­ni­bus fisc­al 2014 spend­ing law has for­bid­den the Pentagon from us­ing ap­pro­pri­ated funds “to con­duct any en­vir­on­ment­al im­pact ana­lys­is re­lated to Minute­man 3 silos that con­tain a mis­sile.”

“If the De­fense De­part­ment is in fact pur­su­ing such a course, we de­mand the leg­al jus­ti­fic­a­tion for how it could so dir­ectly con­tra­dict the let­ter of the law and the re­peatedly stated will of Con­gress,” the four sen­at­ors said.

The Pentagon did not re­turn re­quests for com­ment by press time on wheth­er it was pur­su­ing en­vir­on­ment­al stud­ies of shut­ting down the silos. It is not clear ex­actly what made the law­makers be­lieve the as­sess­ments were tak­ing place, though Cap­it­ol Hill aides on Thursday told the Great Falls Tribune that House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee staff had heard the Air Force was be­gin­ning the stud­ies.

The U.S. Air Force presently de­ploys roughly 450 nuc­le­ar-tipped stra­tegic mis­siles in silos split evenly among three states:  Montana, North Dakota and Wyom­ing. Though the sen­at­ors and rep­res­ent­at­ives from those states are ter­rit­ori­al of the land-based mis­sile mis­sion, a draw-down to no more than 420 of the weapons is in the off­ing; it is only a mat­ter of when.

The New START ac­cord re­quires both the United States and Rus­sia by 2018 to each cap their ar­sen­als of stra­tegic de­liv­ery vehicles — en­com­passing heavy bombers, sub­mar­ine-launched bal­list­ic mis­siles, and silo-based mis­siles — at 700 apiece, with an ad­di­tion­al 100 sys­tems al­lowed in re­serve by each side.

The Pentagon has yet to start im­ple­ment­ing sub­stan­tial re­duc­tions to its stra­tegic de­liv­ery force. However, when they be­gin, they are ex­pec­ted to hap­pen first in the Ohio-class sub­mar­ine fleet, fol­lowed by the elim­in­a­tion of some nuc­le­ar-cap­able air­craft and end­ing with the ground-based mis­siles.

“We strongly be­lieve main­tain­ing our cur­rent ICBM cap­ab­il­ity is vi­tal to pro­mot­ing peace and keep­ing our coun­try and al­lies safe from cur­rent and emer­ging threats,” reads a let­ter sent to the Pentagon on Thursday by Rep­res­ent­at­ives Steve Daines (R-Mont.), Kev­in Cramer (R-N.D.), Cyn­thia Lum­mis (R-Wyo.), Cory Gard­ner (R-Colo.) and Doug Lam­born (R-Colo.). “We are also con­cerned that be­gin­ning an ICBM en­vir­on­ment­al as­sess­ment could sig­ni­fic­antly dam­age the mor­ale of air­men work­ing on this cru­cial mis­sion.”

The en­lis­ted crews and of­ficers charged with op­er­at­ing the Air Force’s Minute­man 3 ar­sen­al in re­cent months have come un­der much pub­lic scru­tiny, amid a move to side­line more than 90 launch con­trol of­ficers who were im­plic­ated in a probe in­to wide­spread-cheat­ing on routine mis­sile-fir­ing cer­ti­fic­a­tion ex­ams. There were also re­cent rev­el­a­tions about an in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to drug pos­ses­sion by some of­ficers at Glob­al Strike Com­mand, which over­sees mis­sile and nuc­le­ar bomber op­er­a­tions.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×