Destroying Chemical Weapons With Household Materials

Sarin has met its greatest match: Water + Bleach.

The Field Deployable Hydrolysis System (FDHS) onboard the M/V Cape Ray stands in the cargo bay of the ship January 2, 2014, in Portsmouth, Virginia.
National Journal
Brian Resnick
Jan. 8, 2014, midnight

The first of Syr­ia’s chem­ic­al weapons have left the coun­try, and are en route to their de­struc­tion. Piled aboard a Dan­ish ship, they’re headed to Italy, where they will meet a U.S. Navy ship out­fit­ted with equip­ment to des­troy the weapons. How much of the Syr­i­an stock­pile has been re­moved re­mains un­known.

But what’s clear is this: Des­troy­ing chem­ic­al weapons is really simple. (In terms of the chem­istry re­quired — not lo­gist­ics. The weapons trans­port­ers, after all, are mov­ing highly deadly agents through a war-torn coun­try.)

The most com­mon­place of chem­ic­als, wa­ter, can des­troy the weapons, in what is called a hy­dro­lys­is re­ac­tion. If you took high-school chem­istry, you have con­duc­ted a hy­dro­lys­is re­ac­tion (come on, you re­mem­ber, right?). Hy­dro­lys­is works like this: When wa­ter — either acid­ic or ba­sic — is mixed with cer­tain chem­ic­als, the wa­ter will act as a knife, sli­cing those chem­ic­al in half. In the case of chem­ic­al weapons such as sar­in gas and VX, they are broken down in­to sim­pler units without such vi­ol­ently tox­ic ef­fects.

As Na­tion­al Journ­al‘s Sara Sorch­er re­por­ted in Decem­ber, the U.S. mil­it­ary has a mo­bile hy­dro­lyz­er that it will em­ploy on the ship. This is what it looks like.

(US Army)

The mil­it­ary boasts that this ma­chine is 99.9 per­cent ef­fect­ive at neut­ral­iz­ing chem­ic­al weapons.

But what’s amaz­ing is that the chem­ic­als it uses to prime the wa­ter for chem­ic­al de­struc­tion are ones you can find at home.

“Wa­ter, so­di­um hy­drox­ide (Na­OH) [also known as lye] and so­di­um hy­po­chlor­ite (Na­O­Cl) [bleach] are re­quired for neut­ral­iz­a­tion of chem­ic­al war­fare ma­ter­i­al and de­con­tam­in­a­tion of sys­tem com­pon­ents,” the Army’s press ma­ter­i­als state. The waste that res­ults, which still might con­tain some nasty chem­ic­als, can then be stored for later dis­pos­al. Of­fi­cials told Sorch­er in Decem­ber that the waste will not be dumped in­to the ocean.

The sim­pli­city of the sys­tem doesn’t mean you should try this at home. Much of the en­gin­eer­ing com­plex­ity in the hy­dro­lyz­er serves to pro­tect the tech­ni­cians who use it from the un­treated chem­ic­als.

(CDC)The United States is good at des­troy­ing chem­ic­al weapons. We, after all, also signed the Geneva chem­ic­al-weapons treaty and des­troyed our own stock­pile. This flow­chart from the Cen­ters for Dis­ease Con­trol and Pre­ven­tion sum­mar­izes the pro­cess well. Click to make it big­ger.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×