Budget Agreement Eases Pentagon’s Sequester Pain

None

Aerial photograph of the Pentagon in Arlington, Va., on Sept. 26, 2003.  DoD photo by Tech. Sgt. Andy Dunaway, U.S. Air Force. 
National Journal
Sara Sorcher Stacy Kaper
Sara Sorcher Stacy Kaper
Dec. 10, 2013, 2:25 p.m.

The two-year budget agree­ment is a pos­it­ive de­vel­op­ment for de­fense watch­ers — mit­ig­at­ing about half the se­quester cuts ex­pec­ted to gouge the de­fense budget in fisc­al year 2014.

The agree­ment, an­nounced Tues­day night by Sen­ate Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Patty Mur­ray, D-Wash., and House Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­man Paul Ry­an, R-Wis., would provide $63 bil­lion in se­quester re­lief over two years, split evenly between de­fense and nondefense pro­grams. By some simple math, that leaves some $31.5 bil­lion in se­quester re­lief for de­fense over the two-year peri­od.

The Pentagon was fa­cing a roughly $52 bil­lion cut from its $527 bil­lion re­quest in fisc­al year 2014. Now, the budget agree­ment says de­fense dis­cre­tion­ary spend­ing would be set at $520.5 bil­lion that year. That fig­ure pre­sum­ably in­cludes the De­part­ment of En­ergy’s nuc­le­ar-weapons pro­grams, mean­ing the de­part­ment will likely be work­ing with closer to a half-tril­lion-dol­lars in fund­ing in fisc­al 2014 — and, to do so, it has front-loaded most of the new­found se­quester re­lief.

“This is a pos­it­ive out­come for the mil­it­ary and in par­tic­u­lar, for the de­fense in­dustry,” Lex­ing­ton In­sti­tute Chief Op­er­at­ing Of­ficer Loren Thompson told Na­tion­al Journ­al, “be­cause it means the pres­id­ent’s re­quest for the Pentagon would only be cut by about 5 per­cent, where the caps would have put it $52 bil­lion lower. What the se­quester re­lief does is, in ef­fect, re­duce the cut to the Pentagon’s base budget in half.”

While the agree­ment doesn’t stave off se­quest­ra­tion’s im­pact on de­fense com­pletely, Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee mem­ber Sen. John Mc­Cain, R-Ar­iz., said “it softens it.” He con­firmed that the se­quester re­lief is “much more” in the first year of the two-year deal.

The im­plic­a­tion of this un­even dis­tri­bu­tion in se­quester re­lief means that fisc­al year 2015 will see less ex­tra money to play around with from this deal.

Thompson, however, cau­tions, “We shouldn’t as­sume any of these agree­ments mean much bey­ond the year in which they are passed — the 2014 num­ber is the one that really mat­ters. Who knows what will hap­pen bey­ond the elec­tion?”

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×