CONGRESS

Who's Who in the Muslim Radicalization Hearings

Updated: March 10, 2011 | 12:41 p.m.
March 7, 2011 | 10:58 a.m.

Rep. Peter King launches his hearings into the radicalization of American Muslims Thursday. (Mannie Garcia/AFP/Getty Images)

Rep. Peter King launches his hearings into the radicalization of American Muslims Thursday, and the full witness list remains secret. But already the key players are staking out turf in a made-for-cable-TV debate about whether Americans should be concerned about homegrown Islamist radicals. King has been criticized both for a McCarthyite campaign against a religious minority and for being going soft by not allowing testimony from some of Islam's harshest critics, like Walid Phares, a Fox News analyst who Muslim groups say has ties to Lebanese Christian militias. (King has said Phares will testify at a later hearing, just not the opener). 

The White House is trying to get out in front of the hearings, with President Obama's deputy national security adviser, Denis McDonough, visiting a Virginia mosque Sunday to promise that "we will not stigmatize or demonize entire communities because of the actions of a few," The New York Times' Sheryl Gay Stolberg reports. So, as the talking heads gear up, here's a guide to the players in this punditry drama:

Peter King 
King insists that it's just common sense to investigate terror groups' attempts to recruit stateside.
What he'll say: "The threat is coming from the Muslim community... the radicalization attempts are directed at the Muslim community. Why should I investigate other communities?"

Keith Ellison
One of two Muslim members of Congress, Ellison represents a Minneapolis district with many immigrants from North Africa. By supporting protesters in Cairo as well as the union workers rallying in Wisconsin, Ellison has "been styling himself as an old-fashioned 'power-to-the-people' activist," the Minneapolis Star-Tribune's Kevin Diaz reports.
What he'll say: Ellison says it's a good idea to investigate radicalization in the country, "but to say we’re going to investigate a — a religious minority and a particular one, I think, is the wrong course of action to take."

Zuhdi Jasser
The former doctor to Congress now heads the the American Islamic Forum for Democracy and supported the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
What he'll say: Islam harbors "an insidious supremacism." Muslims must not sink into a "culture of separatism." Islamic leaders should renounce a role for their religion in government.

Lee Baca
The Los Angeles County Sheriff will testify for Democrats.
What he'll say: Baca disagrees with King that Muslims don't cooperate with law enforcement. "We have as much cooperation as we are capable of acquiring through public trust relationships. ... If [King] has evidence of non-cooperation, he should bring it forward."

Denis McDonough
McDonough, deputy national security adviser, appears to have been tasked with being the White House's Official Critic of the hearings.
What he'll say: "In the United States of America, we don’t practice guilt by association," McDonough told a mostly Muslim audience in Virginia. "And let’s remember that just as violence and extremism are not unique to any one faith, the responsibility to oppose ignorance and violence rests with us all." But the administration is avoiding saying that the hearings shouldn't happen. "We welcome any involvement in the issue. ... It's an important issue," McDonough says.

Bennie Thompson
Thompson, the ranking Democrat on the committee holding the hearings, unsuccessfully pushed to expand the inquiry into include neo-Nazis and right-wing militias.
What he'll say: "Terrorists of all ideologies seek to do Americans harm."
 

Mystery witnesses

King says he'll call the family members of Muslims who joined violent radical groups. Some of these witnesses could come from Minneapolis, from where 20 young men have disappeared after being recruited by Al Shabab in Somalia.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »