Tweet About the Debt Limit Deadline Complicates a Deal

Updated: June 30, 2011 | 1:12 p.m.
June 29, 2011 | 10:40 a.m.

As if Republicans and Democrats didn't have enough problems making a deal to raise the debt ceiling before the government defaults on its debt, this morning, the Treasury Department rejected a Twitter-fueled rumor that it was the deadline to raise the debt ceiling had moved from early August to August 22. “It is unlikely that the date will move by more than a day or two – if at all,” Treasury spokeswoman Colleen Murray said. The confusion began yesterday afternoon when Reuters columnist James Pethokoukis fired off a tweet saying that the deadline for raising the debt ceiling wasn't a deadline at all—in fact, it could easily be moved back: "Developing: Treasury may move back debt-ceiling deadline to Aug. 22." In no time, "phones lit up in Washington and Wall Street," notes The Wall Street Journal and the idea that Republicans and Democrats had all the time in the world to solve their fiscal differences spread.

Sen. Jon Kyl, a chief Republican negotiator on the deficit-reduction package (pictured above), ran with the theme. "Sen. Jon Kyl (R., Ariz.) told reporters... the Treasury Department will soon announce that the August 2 deadline for raising the debt ceiling will be pushed back several weeks," read a blog post on National Review. "The tweet clearly had quite an impact," adds The Journal. "Many Republicans believe Treasury simply made the Aug. 2 date up and don’t buy it. If Treasury moved now to kick the date back three weeks, it would really hurt their negotiating leverage and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner would get pummeled." Later in the night, a "Capitol Hill source" told NBC News a similar story: "The Aug. 2nd drop-dead debt-ceiling date is not likely as hard a date as Treasury is leading on. It could -- and very well may, in fact -- be pushed back to mid-August."

In rejecting the rumors the Treasury spokeswoman said  “We will provide an update on the debt ceiling outlook at the beginning of July, as we have done at the beginning of each month this year." So looks like we're back where we were before, on the edge of chaos if a deal isn't brokered.

Want to add to this story? Comment below or send the author of this post, John Hudson, an email. Have a hot tip or story idea? Let us know on the Open Wire.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »