Pro-Life Camp Divorces Stupak Over Lobbying Gig

Updated: April 14, 2011 | 12:07 p.m.
April 11, 2011 | 5:26 p.m.

For the pro-life camp, it was bad enough when pro-life congressman Bart Stupak caved to Democrats and voted for President Obama's health care bill without the so-called Stupak Amendment attached. Today, the cries of "Judas!" are ringing louder as the Michigan Democrat accepts a position at Venable LLP, a lobbying firm whose client list includes Planned Parenthood of Maryland. While it's not likely that Stupak will directly represent Planned Parenthood, his association with the group feels like a further twist of the knife.

"If you haven’t scratched Stupak off your list, you should do it now," writes John Hayward at Human Events. "Stupak has joined high-powered lobbying firm Venable LLP… and one of their clients is Planned Parenthood." Steven Ertelt at Life News called Stupak the "architect of the sellout of Obamacare" who allowed for "abortion funding loopholes." Debra Moore at Exposing Liberal Lies came down even harder. "Has this man no shame? A true opponent of abortion would mop floors or clean toilets before working for a company which associates with an abortion mill like Planned Parenthood." Meanwhile, Doug Powers at The Powers That Be goes ad hominem. "You can take the pro-lifer out of the weasel lawyer, but you can’t take the weasel lawyer out of the pro-lifer."

Exactly what services Venable performs for Planned Parenthood of Maryland is somewhat unclear. The Maryland branch is not a federally registered lobbying client of Venable but a spokesman for Venable wouldn't comment to Roll Call if the firm performed any lobbying for Planned Parenthood at the state level in Annapolis. 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »