Peter King Supported the IRA Before Hunting for Terrorists

Updated: March 9, 2011 | 9:30 a.m.
March 9, 2011 | 9:22 a.m.

Before Rep. Peter King was holding hearings into why American Muslims aren't doing enough to stop terrorism, he was cheering on the IRA and absolving them of "moral blame" for their terrorism. In the 1980s and 1990s, King unequivocally supported the militant Northern Irish group despite its history of killing civilians, speaking at protests staged by Noraid, which the U.S. government claimed funneled guns and money to the IRA.

One Irish activist who worked with King on a peace deal in Northern Ireland (the photo above is of King posing with Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams on the steps of the Capitol in 1995) is now breaking with the congressman over his "strange journey from Irish radical to Muslim inquisitor," The New York Times' Scott Shane reports.

King's support for the IRA did not waver over the years, judging by his many statements about the group in the two stories below and dug up by Jon Stewart's The Daily Show last night:

1982: “We must pledge ourselves to support those brave men and women who this very moment are carrying forth the struggle against British imperialism in the streets of Belfast and Derry.”

1985: “If civilians are killed in an attack on a military installation, it is certainly regrettable, but I will not morally blame the I.R.A. for it.”

1987: "I'm the Ollie North of Ireland."

1995: "The moral standing of the IRA is equal to that of the British army."

A judge in Belfast once threw King out of the courtroom because King "was an obvious collaborator with the IRA," the judge said. Police picked him out for body searches at other trials.

But King denies that there's a parallel between the groups, because the IRA never attacked the U.S.--which seems to imply that it's OK to target British citizens--and said he would be investigating the Irish community if terrorists were recruiting from within it.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

7:33 a.m.

Latest Response by Michael Schmidt: Debate is Microcosm of Energy Policy

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

6:25 p.m.

Latest Response by Jack Rafuse: The LNG Export Conundrum: Dow Chemical

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:23 p.m.

Latest Response by Bernard L. Weinstein: Export more LNG to fight climate change

More Expert Opinions »