Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Lawrence O'Donnell Makes the Case That Bill O'Reilly's a Socialist Lawrence O'Donnell Makes the Case That Bill O'Reilly's a S...

NEXT :
This ad will end in seconds
 
Close X

Not a member or subscriber? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation
 

 

Lawrence O'Donnell Makes the Case That Bill O'Reilly's a Socialist

Admitted socialist Lawrence O'Donnell wants you to know that Bill O'Reilly's relentless campaign to quash socialism in America is complete hypocrisy. Because Bill O'Reilly himself is a socialist. That's a tricky claim to make for O'Reilly who said last year, "Socialism has no place in the U.S.A. Period." Taking the admitted anti-socialist to task in his criticism over Bill Maher's statements on Friday night's Real Time, O'Donnell corners the Fox News host in a game of "gotcha." Here's the video of O'Donnell's takedown followed by a quick play-by-play:

 

According to Maher, "Socialism doesn’t mean that we’re against making a profit; it just means that government takes over certain things like hospitals, the prisons and the military and schools that shouldn’t be run for profit."

O'Reilly responds, "Well, Maher's absolutely correct. But why? Why would any clear-thinking human being want to give the government more power? That erodes freedom, Bill."

O'Donnell closes it out by explaining:

 

If O'Reilly would just look at his anti-socialism script for just one more minute before it gets loaded onto his teleprompter, even he would realize he is not opposed to government-run military, government-run schools and government-run prisons. That leaves only hospitals in Bill Maher's list of things government runs because they should not be run for profit…

The only difference between O'Reilly and me on socialism is a relatively small difference in degree. We're about this far apart. I'm in favor of a tiny bit more socialism in our economy, particularly in the healthcare sector. And O'Reilly is in favor of a tiny bit less. That's it.

O'Donnell missed one thing, though. Bill O'Reilly basically endorsed the public option in a conversation with a Heritage Foundation scholar last year, just a few months before his "Socialism has no place in the U.S.A." statement. He said, "I want, not for personally for me, but for working Americans, to have a option, that if they don't like their health insurance, if it's too expensive, they can't afford it, if the government can cobble together a cheaper insurance policy that gives the same benefits, I see that as a plus for the folks." Here's that clip:

Now, we all enjoyed O'Reilly's recent debate with Jon Stewart, complete with grinning compliments and O'Reilly's admitting he sometimes doesn't understand what Stewart is talking about. You could bet an O'Donnell-O'Reilly face-off would be much less friendly.

 

Want to add to this story? Comment below or send the author of this post, Adam Clark Estes, an email. Have a hot tip or story idea? Let us know on the Open Wire.

Reprinted with permission from Atlantic Wire. The original story can be found here.

Comments
comments powered by Disqus
 
MORE NATIONAL JOURNAL