BANKING AND FINANCE

Throwing Jabs in Bank-Fee Fight Keeps Durbin in Spotlight

Updated: October 5, 2011 | 6:59 p.m.
October 4, 2011 | 9:25 p.m.

Durbin: Center of debit storm. (AP Photo/Harry Hamburg)

It may be about Round 100, but Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., shows no signs of fatigue in his seemingly never-ending battle with banks over debit-card processing fees.

Bank of America’s decision last week to impose a new $5 monthly debit-card fee—which it blamed on a financial-reform provision authored by Durbin—assures that the banks versus retailers/Durbin grudge match will continue.
So far, Durbin is winning the public-relations battle, with consumer groups and, indirectly, President Obama, defending him from Bank of America’s claim that the measure capping how much banks can charge retailers to process debit-card transactions is translating into higher fees for consumers.

“We are getting to the point where Bank of America is scared that this a fee too far,” said Ed Mierzwinski, consumer-program director for the U.S. Public Interest Research Group, which joined merchants in the fight for Durbin’s “swipe fee” amendment. “How many times did taxpayers bail them out?”
Republicans are trying to get traction on the issue. The office of House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., sent reporters an e-mail titled “Courtesy of Sen. Durbin” right after Bank of America announced the fee.

“At the end of the day, no one is getting elected over debit interchange,” said Jaret Seiberg, a policy analyst with MF Global’s Washington Research Group. “Voters are worried about much more basic threats, such as the ability to keep their job, stay in their home, and support their kids.”

Ed Mills, a policy analyst with FBR Capital Markets & Co., said Bank of America has the most to lose. “From a PR standpoint certainly the biggest impact is to Bank of America,” he said. “The swift, negative, viral reaction to that announcement is going to make other banks think twice about rolling it out.”

It could even be a boon for Durbin in the form of a campaign-cash windfall, particularly if the majority whip pursues legislation to expand his initial measure to include credit cards. “It’s a great fundraising opportunity,” Seiberg said. “There is no downside for Durbin. He’s made his career for the last few years on being the one who takes on the banks. There is only upside for Senator Durbin.”

But there is plenty of heat on Durbin, too.

In a scorching editorial last week, The Chicago Tribune dubbed Bank of America’s upcoming charge, the “Durbin fee.” Lawmakers who sided with the banks during the debate are whispering: “I told you so” in response to Bank of America’s decision to charge consumers $5 a month for debit cards that are used for purchases. SunTrust plans to start charging fees for debit purchases as well, and JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo are running pilot programs.

“It was pretty interesting to see [Durbin] … apologizing to everybody in some ways for the Durbin amendment, which basically shifted money out of the pockets of consumers into the bottom line of Target and Wal-Mart and other entities, so unintended consequences occur,” Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., said during a Senate Banking subcommittee hearing on Tuesday. Corker and Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., led a failed effort earlier this year to repeal the Durbin measure.

This article appears in the Oct. 5, 2011, edition of National Journal Daily.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


More By This Writer
Stacy Kaper's Pic
Stacy Kaper | Staff Writer, Economics
skaper@nationaljournal.com
Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Latest Edition
SUBSCRIPTION ONLY

Today's cover story: "IRS Scandal: Eight Names to Know" -- The controversy surrounding the IRS appears likely to consume Capitol Hill for a second straight week. Two senior IRS officials have already lost their jobs, after it was revealed that the agency targeted conservative groups that applied for tax-exempt status.

Read this and all of the stories in the latest digital edition of National Journal Daily.

National Journal Daily
Latest Congress News
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

11:47 a.m.

Latest Response by Skip Horvath: Stick to Free Trade & U.S. Will Benefit

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

8:23 p.m.

Latest Response by William O'Keefe: LNG: A Rising Tide Does Raise All Boats

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

6:39 p.m.

Latest Response by Laura Barrett: P3s Must Be Accountable to Public

More Expert Opinions »