CULTURE OF WASHINGTON

Survey Finds Politics and Public Policy Favor Men

Updated: July 12, 2012 | 3:34 p.m.
July 11, 2012 | 9:28 p.m.

((AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

People should take note when conservative Republicans and progressive feminists are saying the same thing: that women are sadly underrepresented in all areas of government. There is distinct pessimism reflected among women in politics about their career breaks compared with men. In a National Journal survey of 717 professional Washington women, 73 percent said that men have more opportunities for advancement than women. Six out of 10 said that it is harder for women to attain positions of leadership than it is for men.

Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., is not a liberal feminist, but she echoes feminists’ concerns when she says that more women need to run for office. “I was around the 200th woman to ever serve in Congress, Republican or Democrat.... There has been something like over 11,000 members who served in Congress,” she said in an interview. “We need to encourage women to run for office, especially on the Republican side.”

McMorris Rodgers is unusual. She is the highest-ranking Republican woman in Congress and the congressional liaison for presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney. “It’s still relatively new to see women serving in all these positions and taking on more leadership,” she said.


GRAPHIC: Professional Women's Struggle



GRAPHIC: Federal Employment



GRAPHIC: Female Congressional Staffers

Perhaps that novelty is why NJ’s survey about women in Washington turned up an overall negative outlook, a surprising finding considering the ostensible array of powerful women influencing national policy, from Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton to American Insurance Association President Leigh Ann Pusey. Half of the survey respondents said they had experienced sex discrimination at work. Among women over 60, that number was a whopping 71 percent.

“There are a lot of very high-powered women, and that obscures to some extent the overall problem,” said Jennifer Lawless, a professor who runs the Women and Politics Institute at American University. Lawless’s research suggests that two of the biggest factors contributing to women not running for office relate to their perception of themselves compared to men. First, they think that there is a bias against women in elections. (There actually isn’t, Lawless said. Female and male candidates fare equally.) Second, women think they aren’t qualified to be political candidates. “Men look at themselves, and even if they think they can’t do it they still do it,” she said. “Women hold themselves up to a hypothetical bar that no one could ever reach.”

Women make up 17 percent of Congress. They are underrepresented in the top congressional, administration, and lobbying jobs in Washington, according to NJ’s analysis of available data. Republican women are slightly less likely to attribute the career barriers to gender; 57 percent of Republicans said men have more opportunities than women, compared with 78 percent of Democrats and 71 percent of independents.

Women are populating the lower- and mid-level political jobs in greater numbers, suggesting that it may only be a matter of time—who knows how much—before the gender ratios are less skewed. In the face of these difficulties, NJ’s survey shows that women in Washington are relatively cheerful about their own advancement prospects. Almost two-thirds (65 percent) said they believed that they could advance as far as their talents would take them. That level of optimism was even higher for respondents ages 21 to 29, at 86 percent, and 30 to 39, at 75 percent. Oddly, optimism about career advancement was lower among women in the executive branch (55 percent) than among women on the Hill (75 percent) or in the private sector (72 percent).

In terms of professional opportunities for women, most respondents believed that Washington is either ahead of the rest of the nation (59 percent) or on pace with it (33 percent). Only 9 percent said that Washington lags behind.

This article appears in the July 12, 2012, edition of National Journal Daily.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Latest Edition
SUBSCRIPTION ONLY

Today's cover story: "Both Parties Face Tricky Balancing Act at IRS Hearings" -- Even amid crisis and scandal, the two parties remain as divided as ever—especially when it comes to finding solutions.That much should be evident on Friday morning when the top Democratic and Republican tax writers gather for the first in a series of hearings about problems with the Internal Revenue Service’s screenings of tax-exempt advocacy groups.

Read this and all of the stories in the latest digital edition of National Journal Daily.

National Journal Daily
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

7:05 p.m.

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »