TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Stearns Urges FCC to Drop ‘Byzantine’ Regulations

Updated: April 14, 2011 | 11:35 a.m.
April 12, 2011 | 9:30 p.m.

(Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

A key Republican on the House Energy and Commerce Committee recommended Tuesday that the Federal Communications Commission overhaul what he called its “Byzantine” regulatory processes.

“We need to improve the quality of the FCC’s decisions, and the country’s trust of the FCC itself,” said Rep. Cliff Stearns, R-Fla., chairman of the panel’s Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee. Stearns also is a member of the committee’s Communications and Technology Subcommittee, which he was the ranking member in the 111th Congress.

Stearns and other Republicans have been accusing the Democratic-led agency of overstepping its jurisdiction with the adoption of Internet fairness rules in December—and through other efforts to impose new regulations.

Stearns made his remarks at an event on Capitol Hill sponsored by the Free State Foundation think tank.

In particular, Stearns faulted the FCC for taking weeks or months to release the text of rule changes approved by the agency’s commissioners. This feeds a public perception that the details get “ironed out later through backroom deals,” he said.

Stearns also wants the agency to overhaul its method for reviewing mergers. While the FCC has a six-month “shot clock” for such reviews, it often stops the clock or fails to meet its own deadline. Stearns noted that it took the FCC 16 months to review and approve the union of XM and Sirius radio.

In response, a top FCC official who participated in a panel discussion at the event said the commission is evolving with the times.

“When it comes to regulatory reform, we’re open to business,” said Eddie Lazarus, chief of staff to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski. “We are engaged in a retrospective review of our regulations.”

Nevertheless, Lazarus conceded that the agency is not completely in sync with the digital age. “We still have some regulations related to telegraph services, which I don’t think even exist any more,” he said.

This article appears in the April 13, 2011, edition of National Journal Daily.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Latest Edition
SUBSCRIPTION ONLY

Today's cover story: "Both Parties Face Tricky Balancing Act at IRS Hearings" -- Even amid crisis and scandal, the two parties remain as divided as ever—especially when it comes to finding solutions.That much should be evident on Friday morning when the top Democratic and Republican tax writers gather for the first in a series of hearings about problems with the Internal Revenue Service’s screenings of tax-exempt advocacy groups.

Read this and all of the stories in the latest digital edition of National Journal Daily.

National Journal Daily
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

7:05 p.m.

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

11:03 a.m.

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »