Future Not Guaranteed for Convention Speakers

Updated: August 27, 2012 | 10:08 p.m.
August 27, 2012 | 10:05 p.m.

One-hit wonder: Katherine Ortega (Charles Tasnadi/AP)

In politics, nothing says you’re the future more than getting a coveted prime-time speaking slot at a national convention. Except when it doesn’t. Keep that in mind as the two parties fill those slots for Tampa and Charlotte. It can get pretty confusing.

Only four years ago, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin was the unquestioned future of the Republican Party, the star of the gathering in Minneapolis-St. Paul, and guaranteed to be a big deal at the convention in 2012. But four years later, she’s not governor, not a nominee, and not going to be speaking in Tampa. Instead, viewers will be watching the current “future stars,” a constellation that includes officials totally unknown in 2008: Chris Christie, Mary Fallin, Nikki Haley, Susana Martinez, Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, and Rick Scott. The message that convention organizers want to send is, this is not your father’s—or mother’s—Republican Party. They still remember (can’t forget) the disastrous 1992 convention in Houston when Pat Buchanan’s “culture war” speech pushed Ronald Reagan’s final convention speech out of prime time. Intolerance was the message of Houston, and all but forgotten was the need to build a coalition behind President George H.W. Bush.

What won’t be forgotten in Tampa is the need to elect Mitt Romney. Speakers such as Fallin, Haley, Martinez, and Rubio can help further that goal while presenting a more diverse party. And, because former Presidents George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush as well as former Vice President Dick Cheney are not speaking, the party can spend less time dealing with a past that includes that economic meltdown in 2008.

For the Democrats, a little reminder of the past is very much on the agenda. Former President Carter will be just a video. But former President Clinton will have a prime-time role introducing President Obama and reminding the electorate of the economic good times and the budget surplus the country enjoyed when he left office.

The Clinton past will be balanced by a look at a party future almost certain to carry a Latin accent, with the 37-year-old mayor of San Antonio, Julian Castro, delivering the keynote address on Tuesday night. Just like Palin, Castro will be introduced as the future of the party. Maybe he will be. It certainly turned out that way for the 2004 Democratic keynoter, a young Illinois state senator named Barack Obama. But before Castro banks on that, he might check with other recent keynoters who were supposed to be the futures of their parties—Katherine Ortega, Tom Kean, Susan Molinari, Ann Armstrong, Dan Evans, and Harold Ford.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Latest Edition
SUBSCRIPTION ONLY

Today's cover story: "Meet the Man Who Set Off the IRS Firestorm" -- J. Russell George paused for just a moment before he took his seat at the witness table. He wanted to take it all in. The Treasury inspector general for tax administration, whose audit of the Internal Revenue Service had set off a national firestorm, had been in this very room before—three decades earlier.

Read this and all of the stories in the latest digital edition of National Journal Daily.

National Journal Daily
Columns
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

GOP’s Switch on Financial Disclosure Wins Gold Medal in Hypocrisy Olympics

9:30 p.m.
The IRS scandal evolved from the broader reality that the GOP has changed its financing mantra from “disclosure” to “secrecy.”
Major Garrett: All Powers

Obama Pushes to Accommodate, Not Protect, Freedom of the Press

May 21, 2013
The Justice Department’s secret subpoena of AP phone logs begs questions about Obama’s attitude toward the First Amendment and government scrutiny.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

5:16 p.m.

Latest Response by Phineas Baxandall: It's About Waste, Not Hate

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

3:19 p.m.

Latest Response by James Corless: Time to adapt to the new reality

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

11:51 a.m.

Latest Response by Bill Cooper: U.S. Should Quickly Approve Other Apps

More Expert Opinions »