Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Some Signs of Compromise in House on D-Block Some Signs of Compromise in House on D-Block

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Want access to this content? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation



Some Signs of Compromise in House on D-Block

Lingering concerns about plans for a nationwide emergency communications network for public safety were aired Wednesday at a hearing before the House Energy and Commerce Communications Subcommittee.

At issue is the D-block, a slice of spectrum first responders want to add to frequencies they control to double the size of the proposed network. Proponents say the network could help avoid glitches that hampered responses to the 9/11 attacks and Hurricane Katrina, when emergency workers had difficulty communicating across agencies and jurisdictions.


The state-of-the-art broadband network would rely on 4G technology to enable swift downloads of streaming video and law enforcement databases, and could eventually accommodate Internet-based voice communication.

Public safety groups have growing support in the upper chamber, where Senate Commerce Chairman Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., has tentatively scheduled a June 8 vote on legislation to give the frequencies to first responders for free.

But in the House, prominent Republicans want the D-block auctioned to raise an estimated $3 billion to help offset the network’s construction costs, which are estimated from $6 billion to $20 billion over the next decade. Even the subcommittee’s ranking Democrat, Rep. Anna Eshoo, of California, raised concerns about funding. “Looks like we’re going to be picking up the tab on this, so we have to pay attention to the costs,” she said.


Former Energy and Commerce Chairman Joe Barton, R-Texas, said a lack of spectrum is not the challenge for public safety. Instead, the problem appears to be “a lack of funding at the local level” that can ensure interoperable communications, he said.

Communications Subcommittee Chairman Greg Walden, R-Ore., agreed, suggesting emergency organizations might not be using the extensive number of frequencies they’ve already been granted. “We have provided public safety with nearly 100 megahertz of spectrum for their exclusive use,” Walden said. “Public safety has more spectrum than the vast majority of wireless providers.”

Despite that sentiment, some Republicans hinted they’re willing to seek compromise in an effort to resolve the impasse over the D-block, which has dragged on for years. Energy and Commerce Chairman Fred Upton, R-Mich., said there’s a need for a “bipartisan plan that gets us to the finish line,” while Walden added, “We should continue to examine better ways of creating a public-private partnership.”

And Energy and Commerce ranking member Henry Waxman, D-Calif., said Congress should have public safety legislation ready for President Obama’s signature before September 11 “as a tribute to the brave first responders who risked their lives to save others.”


Rockefeller said that revenue from an upcoming auction of television airwaves—which stations are expected to voluntarily relinquish in exchange for a cut of the auction proceeds—would help pay for the public safety network.

He also said additional money would be available to cover the hefty price tag. “States will get funds for planning grants for infrastructure development. Just as first responders pay to use commercial networks, they will pay to use this one,” Rockefeller said in a statement.

Senate aides close to the situation said Tuesday that the West Virginian will have the backing of the panel’s ranking Republican, Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas, for next week’s vote.

This article appears in the May 26, 2011 edition of NJ Daily.

comments powered by Disqus