Senate Farm Bill Conferees To Make Counteroffer Today

Updated: February 8, 2011 | 11:18 a.m.
April 11, 2008

Senate farm bill conferees hope to make a counteroffer to the House today, according to Senate Agriculture Chairman Tom Harkin.

After emerging from a meeting of most of the 11 Senate conferees, Harkin said Thursday that the conferees plan to meet again in the early afternoon today and finalize the offer. Harkin said he would call a formal meeting of the conference committee for Monday or Tuesday.

On Thursday, House Agriculture Chairman Collin Peterson offered the Senate a farm bill package that would include a $5.5 billion budget increase to be paid for by an increase in government income from stricter credit-card reporting requirements.

Deputy Agriculture Secretary Chuck Conner said Thursday that the Bush administration would not agree to that offset, but House members and staff have said they believe the White House might accept it.

The House offer did not include a provision in the Senate-passed farm bill for a $4 billion farm disaster aid program or $2.5 billion in agricultural tax cuts.

Peterson said he is not personally opposed to the disaster aid program, but he does not believe it should be funded with money subject to pay-go rules.

In the past, disaster programs have been funded on an emergency basis. Peterson said he believes the tax package should be left out, but Senate Finance ranking member Charles Grassley said he considers it a necessary part of the bill.

After the Senate conferees’ meeting, Harkin, Senate Agriculture ranking member Saxby Chambliss and Senate Budget Chairman Kent Conrad said the counteroffer would be for a $10 billion increase in the farm bill budget over 10 years and would include an offset proposal to cover it.

Grassley declined to comment on the meeting, but said he and Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus would meet to discuss the offset issue and the tax package before the meeting today.

In a thinly veiled reference to Peterson and House Speaker Pelosi, Conrad said “everyone had previously agreed to” the $10 billion increase in the farm bill and to use measures under control of the Senate Finance and House Ways and Means committees to pay for it.

This article appears in the April 12, 2008, edition of National Journal Daily.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Latest Edition
SUBSCRIPTION ONLY

Today's cover story: "As Focus Continues on IRS Scandal, Congress Tackles Keystone Pipeline, Farm Bill" -- Amid continued focus on the Internal Revenue Service and other controversies that have hit the Obama administration, lawmakers this week will take up items that sputtered in the last Congress, with the House set to address the Keystone XL pipeline again and the Senate starting debate on its farm bill.

Read this and all of the stories in the latest digital edition of National Journal Daily.

National Journal Daily
Latest Congress News
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

9:13 a.m.

Latest Response by Marty Durbin: Pick Up the Pace On Export Approvals

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

7:32 a.m.

Latest Response by Margo Thorning: Capitalize on Robust U.S. Natural Gas Sources

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

7:29 a.m.

Latest Response by Marty: Pick Up the Pace on Export Approvals

More Expert Opinions »