SENATE

Senate Democrats Skewer No-Revenue Deal

Updated: July 22, 2011 | 2:25 p.m.
July 21, 2011 | 9:30 p.m.

Mikulski: Feeling left out—and furious. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Senate Democrats have offered what one top lawmaker called a “volcanic” reaction to news the White House and House Republicans are discussing a grand-bargain, debt-ceiling deal that includes no new revenue.

The loud opposition on Thursday underscores the truth of White House and GOP denials that a deal is close; an agreement of the sort described between President Obama and the GOP would be a long way from passing. News of the proposal raises the odds that a default of the U.S. government will be avoided by August 2, but with the possible deal’s prospects dicey in both chambers, one of multiple fallback options may still offer a more likely course.

The White House and Republican leaders are discussing a potential agreement that would cut spending by $3 trillion over 10 years including through reductions in Medicare and Social Security spending, while raising the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling, lawmakers said. Aides said the plan would include a tax reform effort in 2012 with new tax revenue, but no significant upfront tax increases.

Democrats see that as major and unnecessary concession. They are especially incensed because the White House floated the plan while House Republicans, in Democrats’ view, are increasingly cornered, under attack for recalcitrance and eyeing a face-saving compromise.

Democrats rarely fail to grumble when the White House weighs deals with Republicans. But in this case, Democratic opposition might be significant enough, if a deal emerges, to defeat a bill in the Senate.

Office of Management and Budget Director Jack Lew got an earful from Senate Democrats at a contentious caucus meeting Thursday, senators and staffers said.

Democrats “are volcanic at this point,” Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., told reporters. “You can’t ask us to vote when we haven’t been part of the deal.”

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., who could largely determine the prospects of legislation based on the potential deal in the upper chamber, stopped short of an explicit attack Thursday afternoon. But Reid made it clear he is unhappy with the drift of the talks.

“There has to be fairness in this,” Reid said. “There has to be some revenue and cuts. My caucus agrees with that. I hope the president sticks with that.”

Votes would also be far from guaranteed in the House. With Democrats likely to oppose the proposal, Republicans would need to supply the lion’s share of support. With a block of conservatives still vowing to oppose any debt ceiling increase and any defense cuts in the plan, that is a tall task. Others would likely bristle at the tax revenue increase even if it’s down the road and there are promises of lower rates.

Like rank-and-file senators, House Republicans said they remain in the dark. Boehner met with House Republicans on Friday to discuss the debt talks and said he and the Democrats are not close to a deal. Many House Republicans said they will press Boehner personally for details of the potential deal. Several said they had unsuccessfully sought information from the speaker’s office Thursday.

While talk of a grand bargain grabbed attention, leaders in both chambers continued to prep fallback plans. House Republicans, supported by the Senate GOP, are drafting the text of legislation to impose perhaps $1.5 trillion in cuts identified in talks led by Vice President Joe Biden, GOP aides said. A debt ceiling increase of a matching amount would force Congress to revisit the limit in early 2012.

Reid scheduled the Senate vote on the House-passed cut, cap, and balance bill for Friday instead of Saturday; the bill failed. Reid said before the measure was defeated Friday that he is ready to start floor action as soon as Saturday on a fallback option crafted with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., that would give Obama power to raise the debt ceiling by $2.5 trillion in three steps. But that plan faces stiff opposition from House Republicans, and the open Senate schedule could be used for an alternative proposal.

Billy House and Meghan McCarthy contributed

This article appears in the July 22, 2011, edition of National Journal Daily.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Latest Edition
SUBSCRIPTION ONLY

Today's cover story: "Meet the Man Who Set Off the IRS Firestorm" -- J. Russell George paused for just a moment before he took his seat at the witness table. He wanted to take it all in. The Treasury inspector general for tax administration, whose audit of the Internal Revenue Service had set off a national firestorm, had been in this very room before—three decades earlier.

Read this and all of the stories in the latest digital edition of National Journal Daily.

National Journal Daily
Columns
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

GOP’s Switch on Financial Disclosure Wins Gold Medal in Hypocrisy Olympics

9:30 p.m.
The IRS scandal evolved from the broader reality that the GOP has changed its financing mantra from “disclosure” to “secrecy.”
Major Garrett: All Powers

Obama Pushes to Accommodate, Not Protect, Freedom of the Press

May 21, 2013
The Justice Department’s secret subpoena of AP phone logs begs questions about Obama’s attitude toward the First Amendment and government scrutiny.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

11:51 a.m.

Latest Response by Bill Cooper: U.S. Should Quickly Approve Other Apps

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

11:21 a.m.

Latest Response by Margot Anderson: U.S. Prices To Impact Natural-Gas Exports More

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

10:43 p.m.

Latest Response by Gabriel Roth: But do we not drive to save time?

More Expert Opinions »