Ryan’s New Mantra: Are You Better Off Now?

Updated: September 3, 2012 | 10:06 p.m.
September 3, 2012 | 10:05 p.m.

On the eve of the Democratic National Convention, Republicans are hoping to blunt any bounce in the polls for President Obama by dispatching vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan to hammer home the message that Americans are not better off than they were four years ago.

“We’re gonna hear a lot of words from Charlotte this week. But here’s the kind of words we’re not gonna hear: We’re not gonna hear evidence and facts about how people are better off,” Ryan told a crowd of more than 2,000 people at East Carolina University during a rally on Monday. “You see, the president cannot run on this record. He’s run out of ideas. And so, that is why he’s going to be running a campaign based on envy and division, based on
frustration and anger.” Ryan referenced inconsistent answers that some top Democrats had given over the weekend in response to interview questions about whether Americans are better off now than they were four years ago, the quadrennial question facing incumbents seeking reelection.

“Every president since the Great Depression who asked Americans to send them into a second term could say that you are better off today than you were four years ago,” Ryan said, “except for Jimmy Carter and for President Barack Obama.”

He ticked off a list of measures—the jobless rate, bankruptcy filings, and delinquent mortgage payments—that he said were better under Carter than they are now. Carter lost his bid for a second term in 1980 to Republican Ronald Reagan. “Simply put, the Jimmy Carter years look like the good old days compared to where we are right now,” said Ryan, who plans to continue the message into Tuesday.

A Gallup Poll released on Monday showed that Mitt Romney’s convention address did little to move the dial for him with voters. Forty percent of adults surveyed said that Romney’s speech on Thursday made them more likely to vote for him, just 2 percentage points higher than the 38 percent who said it made them less likely to vote for him. Among independents, 36 percent said they were more likely to vote for Romney after his speech, and 33 percent said they were less likely. Thirty percent said the speech made no difference.

Those results were comparable to the impact of convention speeches by Republican candidates John McCain in 2008 and George W. Bush in 2004, according to Gallup. Romney received the lowest marks for the quality of his convention speech of any nominee since Bob Dole in 1996.

Back in 2008, Obama saw some convention bounce from his address, with a Gallup Poll showing that 43 percent of voters said they were more likely to support him after the speech, while 29 percent said they were less likely. The sharpest impact from a convention speech was in 1992, when 60 percent of Americans said it made them more likely to vote for Democratic candidate Bill Clinton; just 15 percent said otherwise.

Romney spent the Labor Day holiday out of the public eye at his summer home in Wolfeboro, N.H., with his wife, Ann. The former Massachusetts governor is scheduled to spend the next three days at the Vermont home of Kerry Healey, who served as his lieutenant governor, holding practice sessions for the fall debates.

Romney will be joined for some of the sessions by Sen. Rob Portman of Ohio, who will portray Obama in mock debates, a role he also played for McCain in 2008.

Ryan on Tuesday will make his fifth trip to the swing state of Ohio for a rally in Westlake, a Cleveland suburb. Afterward, he’ll travel to Iowa for stops in Cedar Rapids and Des Moines.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Latest Edition
SUBSCRIPTION ONLY

Today's cover story: "Both Parties Face Tricky Balancing Act at IRS Hearings" -- Even amid crisis and scandal, the two parties remain as divided as ever—especially when it comes to finding solutions.That much should be evident on Friday morning when the top Democratic and Republican tax writers gather for the first in a series of hearings about problems with the Internal Revenue Service’s screenings of tax-exempt advocacy groups.

Read this and all of the stories in the latest digital edition of National Journal Daily.

National Journal Daily
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

7:05 p.m.

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

11:03 a.m.

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »